Skip to content

All posts by NNL - 95. page

Death Count: An Independent Researcher Estimated Wuhan Death Toll to Be Between 22,000 and 30,000

As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) hides the infection and death count of the coronavirus in China, researchers are trying to estimate the actual number. Yaxue Cao, an editor of the democracy promotion media China Change, estimated the total infection cases in Wuhan to be between 400,000 and 600,000, and the death toll to be between 22,000 and 30,000.

1. Death Toll

On March 23, the second largest crematorium in Wuhan, the Wuchang Funeral Home, announced that, “The funeral home will distribute 500 urns per day, and will try to distribute all of them before the Tomb Sweeping Day” (the traditional Chinese holiday to commemorate the dead, also known as Qingming), which was April 4 this year. In other words, the Wuchang Funeral Home was to distribute approximately 6,000 urns in the 12 days leading up to April 4:

500 x 12 = 6,000

The Wuchang Funeral Home has 15 cremation furnaces; each furnace would have burned 400 bodies during the 60 days. There have been anecdotal reports of some furnaces being out of order before or during this period. Suppose 8 furnaces (about 10%) were not working. The adjusted number of cremations for the remaining 76 furnaces would be:

400*76 = 30,400

According to the city’s official statistics, in 2018, the number of Wuhan’s natural deaths was 47,900, averaging 131 deaths per day in the city. Based on this rate, about 7,860 people died of causes other than coronavirus infection during the 60 days:

130*60 = 7,860

During the 60 days from January 23 to March 23, approximately 22,540 people died from the coronavirus infection:

30,400 – 7,860 = 22,540

An estimate of the death toll from December 1 to January 22 could be a few hundred or a few thousand, and we just don’t know. So the total death toll in Wuhan is in the range of 22,000 to 30,000.

2. Infection Count

a) Using Wuhan’s Official Death Rate:

Caixin’s Domestic Observation of Covid-19 (境内疫情观察) updates, among other data, the death rate of cities in Hubei Province.  As of March 23, the death rate was 5 percent in Wuhan based on statistics posted by the National Health Commission and the local health commissions. If this rate is correct, using the estimated death toll of 22,000 to 30,000, the likely number of confirmed cases would fall between 440,000 to 600,000.

b) Inferring from the infection rate of foreign nationals pulled out of Wuhan:

In early February when countries, such as Japan, South Korea, Singapore, and Germany, began to pull their nationals out of Wuhan, netizens noted the percentage of infections of each group, and estimated how many people had been infected in Wuhan using the average infection rate of these groups.

Japan withdrew 565 nationals with 8 confirmed cases and the infection rate was about 1.42 percent; South Korea withdrew 368 nationals with 5 confirmed cases, with an infection rate of about 1.36 percent; Singapore withdrew 92 nationals with 1 confirmed cases, an infection rate of about 1.08 percent; and Germany withdrew 124 nationals with 2 confirmed cases, an infection rate of about 1.61 percent. The average infection rate among these four groups is 1.37 percent.

Domestically, of the 5,239 people who returned from Wuhan to Leqing, Wenzhou City (温州乐清市), there were 69 confirmed cases, the infection rate was 1.32 percent.

The average infection rate, based on these 5 groups, is 1.358 percent. Given the city’s population of 15 million:

15,000,000*1.358% = 203,700

Now factor in the R0, that is, the average number of people who will catch the disease from a single infected person.

Over the week of January 20, according to an article in The Atlantic published on January 28, “at least six teams of researchers, along with the World Health Organization, have published estimates of R0 for the new coronavirus. All these groups used different methods, but their results have been mostly consistent, with estimates hovering between 2 and 3. WHO was a little more conservative than the others, with estimates of 1.4 to 2.5. One Chinese team is a clear outlier, with estimates of 3.3 to 5.5. A British-led group initially published a high average value of 3.8 last week before revising it downward to 2.5 as new data emerged.”

These R0 estimates were specific to Wuhan, and R0 2-3 seems to correspond pretty well with the estimates using China’s official death rate in Wuhan: – between 203,700*2 and 203,700*3, or between 407,400 and 611,100.

Related postings on Chinascope:

Source: China Change, April 12, 2020

No Access to the CIA Report? Let’s DIY: Estimating Total Infections and Death Toll in Wuhan, the Epicenter of Covid-19

Infection Count: AEI: 2.9 Million Chinese May Have Been Infected with Coronavirus

As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) hides the infection and death count of the coronavirus in China, researchers are trying to estimate the actual number. The American Enterprise Institute (AEI) published a report that estimates about 2.9 million Chinese may have been infected.

The report said that China’s COVID-19 figures are not arithmetically sensible. The CCP has deliberately made estimation difficult. Outside of Wuhan city and Hubei province, cases are low by a factor of 100 or more.

In late January, Chinese media provided information about migrant outflow from Wuhan before the quarantine. Using a lower number than theirs, then conservative figures for migrants’ infection rate and time in circulation before the national lockdown, the report generates an estimate of 2.9 million cases.

Related postings on Chinascope:

Source: American Enterprise Institute, April 7, 2020

Estimating the true number of China’s COVID-19 cases

Infection Count: Trump Administration Official: China’s Real Count Could Be 50 Times Bigger

As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) hides the infection and death count of the coronavirus in China, researchers are trying to estimate the actual number. Fox News reported that a Trump administration official told it that they estimate that China has under-reported the true nationwide tally of the coronavirus infection and death count by at least a factor of 50.

The official said, “The People’s Republic of China (PRC) numbers as reported today seem to be arithmetically impossible. Again, we don’t know the real numbers today, but we do know the about 80,000 infections and 4,000 deaths as reported by the Chinese Communist Party propaganda are not even remotely close.”

In support of this claim, officials point to the existence of seven funeral homes inside Wuhan city with a total incineration capacity of about 2,000 corpses per day. They also flagged recent reporting that incinerators have been in near-constant use for 24 hours per day over the past several weeks. They note that, at this rate, the city’s incineration capacity nears 60,000 corpses per month.

Between March 23 and April 4, the Wuhan government tried to return 500 urns per day to Wuhan families, or about one urn per minute of each day, in accordance with official social distancing recommendations. Based on this official guidance, sources arrive at a lower-end total tally of 45,500 corpses incinerated earlier and returned to their families.

Related postings on Chinascope:

Source: Fox News, April 27, 2020
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/china-could-have-50-times-more-coronavirus-cases-than-claimed-trump-administration-official-says

Hiding Information: Inner Mongolia Document Shows China Developed Coronavirus Treatment Plan and Guidance before January 15

Epoch Times obtained a document from the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region (AR) that shows China’s National Health Commission had created a treatment and prevention plan for pneumonia caused by the novel coronavirus before January 15.

The document, titled “Emergency Notice on the Medical Treatment of Pneumonia Cases from the Novel Coronavirus Infection,” was issued by the Inner Mongolia AR Health Commission on January 15. It passed down the National Health Commission’s “treatment plan, work requirements for pre-examination and fever examination, confirmation procedure for the first (coronavirus) case, and requirements on hospital infection prevention and control and healthcare providers’ personal protection” to the AR’s subordinate health commissions.

The emergency notice pointed out the virus originated in Wuhan and asked the medical staff to “improve early-stage detection capability” and “ask the patients who had a temperature whether they had been exposed to Wuhan markets in the past two weeks.”

The document is marked “Super Urgent” and “Not to Be Disclosed.” It states “for internal work use and not to be allowed to be spread on the Internet.”

Related postings on Chinascope:

Continue reading

Infection Count: Heilongjiang Province Either Is Having Or Facing Epidemic Outbreak

More and more news indicates that Heilongjiang Province is either already suffering a wide spread of the coronavirus or is facing a large outbreak.

#1: On April 27, Xi Jinping, at the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Politburo Standing Committee meeting, singled out Heilongjiang, stating that it must strengthen measures on epidemic prevention and control, investigate loopholes, and fix shortcomings, especially in the prevention of hospital infections. (Oriental Daily)

#2: On April 30, the State Council sent a supervisory group to Heilongjiang to oversee their coronavirus prevention work. Several members were sent from the supervisory group to Hubei. On May 1, the supervisory group reported four major issues found in Heilongjiang:

  1. A lack of understanding of epidemic prevention and control.
  2. Weaknesses in “before hospital” management: people entering Heilongjiang from abroad were not quarantined in a centralized location, checkpoints did not test people strictly, and local communities did not have effective prevention and control.
  3. The authorities did not conduct enough coronavirus tests.
  4. Hospitals did not have effective prevention and control measures. (Central News Agency)

#3: On May 1, Harbin, the capital city of Heilongjiang, issued an urgent notice to all districts, counties, and municipal agencies: starting on May 2, all restaurants doing BBQ, hot pot, and pot cooking services should stop dining-in services. When to open the service will be decided later. Shopping malls, supermarkets, and farmer’s markets should manage indoor ventilation, conduct disinfection, require people to wear face masks, measure each visitor’s body temperature, scan their health codes on mobile phones, and restrict the number of visitors. (China National Radio)

Related postings on Chinascope:

Continue reading

Leadership: China Sets Date for the “Lianghui” (“Two Conferences”)

The “Lianghui,” or “Two Conferences,” is a common Mandarin Chinese abbreviation for the national or local People’s Congress and the national or local committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference. It’s a rubber stamp process to show that representatives of the people in the country or in a local region have reviewed and approved of the work of the central or local government and they make decisions on the personnel in the committees of the People’s Congress and the People’s Political Consultative Conference.

Traditionally, the national level of the “lianghui” takes places in Beijing in early March, with each conference running for over ten days. However, due to the outbreak of the coronavirus, Beijing postponed it.

On April 29, Beijing announced it would hold the National People’s Congress on May 22 and the National People’s Political Consultative Conference on May 21. The duration of each conference will be shortened, but the details have not been announced.

The local “lianghui,” mainly the municipal level and then the provincial level of the two conferences should take place before the national conferences. Some provinces have completed their meetings already, including Hubei Province which met in the middle of January. Other local governments will probably need to hold their conferences soon.

Related postings on Chinascope:

Continue reading

Propaganda and Lies: Xinhua Said Coronavirus Started in January or Possibly Even December in the U.S.

The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) recently started a new wave of claiming the U.S. was the origin of the coronavirus.

This was not the first time that the CCP made such an attempt. The last wave was initiated when the Spokesperson for China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Zhao Lijian, claimed that American soldiers brought it to Wuhan. President Trump and other U.S. officials seriously and furiously rejected China’s blame. Then the CCP was quiet for a while.

On April 26, Xinhua published an International Commentary:

“The recent report from the Public Health Department of Santa Clara County in California showed that people there died from the novel coronavirus as early as February 6. That was more than 20 days earlier than the first coronavirus death that the U.S. announced publicly. Since that patient didn’t travel to other countries, this discovery means that the infection in that society might have already taken place in early or mid-January.

“On March 11, Robert Redfield, Director of the US Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), admitted at a Congressional hearing that there were cases of deaths from the novel coronavirus being mistaken for deaths from influenza.

“In fact, a clear picture of the timeline of the coronavirus outbreaks in the U.S. has always been missing. The California report shows that the U.S. might have had infections in society as early as January, but that could just be the tip of the iceberg. California Governor Newsom has announced an autopsy would be conducted on deaths since last December that were suspected of being caused by the novel coronavirus. People are waiting to see what new findings this may lead to.”

Related postings on Chinascope:

Continue reading

Propaganda and Lies: China Started a New Round of Blaming the U.S. as the Origin of Coronavirus

The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) recently started a new wave of claims against the U.S. as the origin of the coronavirus.

This was not the first time that the CCP made such an attempt. The last wave was initiated by China’s Foreign Minister Spokesperson Zhao Lijian who claimed that American soldiers brought the coronavirus to Wuhan. President Trump and other U.S. officials seriously and furiously rejected China’s blame.

On March 31, The U.S. Department of State spokesperson Morgan Ortagus stated that Xi Jinping, in his conversation with President Trump on March 26, promised to control the Chinese side to keep it from blaming the U.S. China has since been quiet. (#1: Radio France International)

However, on April 23, China started the accusations again.

At a news briefing of the Joint Prevention and Join Control of the Coronavirus Mechanism of the State Council, a reporter asked Shi Yi, a researcher at the Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences:

“Recently, foreign media reported that the U.S. military restarted the Fort Detrick Biochemical Research Laboratory in Maryland. Many local people began to flee when they got the news. Some people in the U.S. believe that there is multiple evidence indicating that the shutting down of the Fort Detrick lab in August last year was very suspicious. They suspect that the base may be the source of the novel coronavirus and caused the influenza pandemic in the fall and winter in the U.S. Then the virus mutated after American soldiers participating in the Wuhan Military Games brought it over to China and spread it in China. How do you view this issue?”

Shi Yi replied, “We have noticed relevant information on the Internet. Some people in the U.S. suspect that the Fort Detrick lab may be the source of the novel coronavirus. The U.S. has not provided a response publicly yet and we have no way to make a judgment.” (#2: China News Service)

Many Chinese media, including China Central Television (CCTV) and the government’s official site reported this Q&A. (#3: CCTV and #4: China’s Government Site)

Radio Free Asia commented that this was a well-arranged Q&A. A news reporter from an official media read a lengthy paragraph stating a prepared question (which was a statement rather than a question, which was a mixture of truth and misinformation). Then Shi Yi read back the prepared answer. In fact, the Fort Detrick lab was closed in July of last year due to the failure of the steam sterilization equipment; it now has a new wastewater treatment system. (#5: Radio Free Asia)

Related postings on Chinascope:

Continue reading