Skip to content

Chinese Tech Giants Intensify Lobbying Efforts in Europe: Huawei and TikTok’s Growing Influence

According to LobbyControl, a non-government organization that monitors lobbying in Germany and other parts of Europe, China’s Huawei spends €3 million annually on lobbying in Brussels and has 12 full-time lobbyists in the EU. Their focus has been on gaining access to 5G network construction, especially in Germany. Huawei has also implemented “youth sponsorship and scholarship” programs to improve its image.

TikTok spends €1.25 million on lobbying in Brussels, employing five full-time lobbyists. In Germany, they spend about €200,000 and have three full-time representatives. TikTok has invested heavily in advertising and sponsorships to enhance its reputation.

Both companies are members of various professional associations in the EU and Germany, aiming to expand their influence. Relationships with think tanks and friendship associations also play crucial roles in their lobbying efforts.

LobbyControl concludes that Chinese tech companies are intensifying their lobbying efforts in the EU, creating complex networks that sometimes lack transparency. While not as aggressive as American tech companies, Chinese firms are becoming increasingly active and influential. They receive support from official institutions within China as well as from German industry.

The report predicts that more Chinese tech companies will enter the European market in the coming years, potentially leading to large-scale lobbying activities if EU policies conflict with their interests. LobbyControl pledges to monitor these developments and push for increased transparency and anti-corruption measures.

Source: Deutsche Welle, August 20, 2024
https://p.dw.com/p/4jgTv

German Investment in China Surges Despite Government Warnings

German direct investment in China has seen a significant uptick in 2023, defying the German government’s calls for economic diversification and reduced dependence on China. According to data from the German central bank, German direct investment in China reached €7.3 billion in the first half of 2023 alone, already surpassing the €6.5 billion recorded for the entire year of 2022.

This trend stands in stark contrast to the German government’s new China strategy which, due to geopolitical concerns, advocates for reduced reliance on the Asian economic powerhouse. German media analysis reveals a complex picture of motivations for and consequences following this investment surge.

Major German companies, particularly automakers like Volkswagen, appear to be disregarding government warnings about geopolitical risks. Many are adopting an “in China, for China” strategy, focusing on localizing production and supply chains to serve the Chinese market directly.
Interestingly, the bulk of these investments stem from profits earned within China, with relatively little new capital flowing from Germany. This suggests a self-reinforcing cycle of investments and returns within the Chinese market.

Some experts have expressed concern that German businesses may have not fully internalized the lessons of the Ukraine war and Germany’s previous overdependence on Russia. They warn of potential risks should China-Taiwan tensions escalate, risks which could have devastating consequences for companies heavily invested in China.

In explaining their increased investment, German firms cite China’s importance as a growth market. They argue that investing in China doesn’t necessarily mean abandoning operations in Germany. Critics contend that this strategy might ultimately benefit job creation in China more than in Germany. Domestic factors in Germany, such as high taxes, bureaucratic hurdles, and a growing shortage of skilled workers, are also pushing companies to look eastward for investment opportunities.

Source Radio France International, August 20, 2024
https://rfi.my/AtDa

Impoverished Beijing Graduate Starves to Death in Xi’an, Highlighting Social Inequality and Job Struggles in China

A widely circulated article on Chinese social media disclosed the story of a woman born in a poor, rural area, who graduated from a prestigious university in Beijing. She was not able to find a job, however, and she repeatedly took the public sector tests in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region and achieved the highest possible score several times. Nevertheless, she was not hired due to lacking social connections. She eventually went to Xi’an City, Shaanxi Province, to seek employment. She rented an apartment but, due to a lack of money, she starved to death at the age of 33. Her body was discovered approximately 20 days after her death.

Source: Epoch Times, August 18, 2024
https://www.epochtimes.com/gb/24/8/18/n14313413.htm

Chinese Coast Guard Attacks Philippine Supply Ship in South China Sea Amid Rising Tensions

The Philippine government stated on August 25 that a Philippine Bureau of Fisheries ship was rammed and hit with a water-cannon by a Chinese coast guard vessel earlier that day while delivering food, fuel, and medical supplies to Filipino fishermen at Sabina Shoal in the South China Sea. While the Philippine supply ship sailed from Half Moon Shoal to Sabina Shoal, the Chinese vessels’ “dangerous maneuvers” caused the Philippine ship’s engine to fail, forcing it to abandon the supply mission.

In response, Gan Yu, a spokesperson for the China Coast Guard, issued a statement claiming that a Philippine vessel “illegally entered the waters near China’s Xianbin Reef in the Nansha Islands without permission from the Chinese government, and that the China Coast Guard took control measures according to the law.” The statement accused the Philippine vessel of “ignoring China’s stern warnings” and “deliberately colliding with the Chinese coast guard ship in an unprofessional and dangerous manner.” It stated that “responsibility [for the incident] lies entirely on the Philippine side.”

In April of this year, the Philippine Coast Guard accused Chinese vessels of dumping crushed coral on Sabina Shoal, a possible attempt at land reclamation. Since then, the Philippine Coast Guard has stationed one of its largest patrol ships at the shoal to monitor the area.

There have been several intense and dangerous confrontations between China and the Philippines in the South China Sea in August, including a confrontation between vessels near the Second Thomas Shoal; two Chinese military aircraft firing flares at a Philippine Air Force patrol plane over Scarborough Shoal on August 8, and a second occurrence of Chinese aircraft firing flares at a Philippine plane over the Subi Reef on August 22.

Source: VOA, August 25, 2024
https://www.voachinese.com/a/china-philippines-clash-in-south-china-sea-despite-efforts-to-rebuild-trust-20240825/7756250.html

Public Questions China’s New Housing Pension System, Suspects Disguised Property Tax Program

China’s Vice Minister of Housing and Urban-Rural Development, Dong Jianguo, stated at a press conference on August 23 that the government is studying the establishment of a system for building inspections, housing pensions, and housing insurance. Currently, 22 cities, including Shanghai, are conducting trials. He stated that, when purchasing a property, homeowners will have already set up a personal account for payment into a public “residential special maintenance fund.” The focus of the trial is for the government to establish such a fund.

Netizens have widely discussed this “Housing Pension System” topic, speculating that the system could be a disguised form of property tax. The official “Construction Magazine” WeChat account of the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development published an editorial on August 26 stating that Vice Minister Dong’s original statement regarding the new pilot program mentioned that “the focus of the trial is for the government to establish a public account,” and that this public account does not require contributions from the public.

Mainland Chinese netizens are not convinced, however. Some have questioned why there is a rush to raise additional funds as there is already a “residential special maintenance fund” in place.

Source: Epoch Times, August 24, 2024
https://www.epochtimes.com/gb/24/8/26/n14317935.htm

Chinese Restaurant Industry Faces Crisis: From “Golden Era” to Struggle for Survival

The Chinese restaurant industry is facing significant challenges. For example, Taiwanese dumpling chain restaurant Din Tai Fung will close 14 branches across several cities in China by October 31st. This decision has sparked widespread concern about the industry’s struggles since the pandemic.

China’s restaurant sector is experiencing a collective downturn, despite that fact that COVID-19 restrictions have now been lifted in China. In the first half of 2024, over a million Chinese restaurants closed, nearly doubling the figure seen in 2022. Many business owners have lost their investments and have been forced to exit the market.

Even large restaurant chains are struggling. Nayuki expects losses of 420-490 million yuan (US$59 – 69 million), Haidilao projects losses of at least 260 million yuan (US$36 million), and Luckin Coffee’s profits have dropped by 50% compared to last year.

The industry faces rising costs for taxes, social security, and wages, while prices and profits are declining. Most large restaurant companies are experiencing profit declines, with Xiabu Xiabu seeing the most significant drop – a 133-fold increase in net loss.

Luckin Coffee, despite opening thousands of new stores and increasing revenue by 38%, saw its net profit fall by 50%, illustrating the phenomenon of “increasing revenue but not increasing profit.”

As price wars continue, the Chinese restaurant industry has entered a low-profit era. The once “golden” market is no longer, and experts predict that the situation may become even more challenging in the future.

Source: Central News Agency (Taiwan), August 26, 2024
https://www.cna.com.tw/news/acn/202408260296.aspx

RFI Chinese: PwC Expects Six-Month Business Ban from Chinese Authorities

Radio France Internationale (RFI) Chinese Edition recently reported that PwC China told clients it that expects Chinese authorities to impose a six-month business ban starting as early as September. This will be part of punitive measures imposed on PwC following a PwC audit of collapsed Chinese real estate developer Evergrande. China’s securities regulator said in March that Evergrande had reported an inflated revenue of nearly US$80 billion in Mainland China in the two years prior to defaulting on its debt in 2021. The regulators charged that PwC China’s audit of Evergrande’s accounting records had been improper.

PwC’s business ban and a potential hefty fine are probably the toughest action ever taken by Chinese regulators against a Big Four accounting firm. The Chinese government has stepped up scrutiny of the role of auditors in financial scandals, this time in the crisis-ridden real estate sector, which once contributed about a quarter of China’s GDP. PwC China was China’s highest-revenue accounting firm in 2022, with revenue reaching 7.9 billion yuan (around US$1.11 billion). PwC China’s rival Deloitte China was given a US$31 million fine last year for “serious audit deficiencies” related to Deloitte’s audit of China Huarong Asset Management. As part of the penalty imposed by Beijing, Deloitte China suspended operations for three months last year.

Many of PwC’s publicly listed Chinese clients have been banned for three years from cooperating with audit firms sanctioned by the authorities. This year, PwC China lost at least two-thirds of its accounting revenue from its Chinese-listed clients. That being said, Chinese-listed companies and state-owned enterprise clients account for only a minority of PwC China’s revenue; PwC is actively reassuring its largest internationally-listed clients, including internet giants Alibaba and Tencent, that it can complete their 2024 audits work.

Source: RFI Chinese, August 22, 2024
https://tinyurl.com/zdtten7b

RFA: Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges Adjust Information Disclosure Mechanism

Radio Free Asia (RFA) recently reported that the Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges have adjusted their information disclosure mechanisms, ceasing publication of daily net trading volume data and other data starting from August 19. This has cut off information on the flow of foreign funds into China’s A-shares market through the Hong Kong markets. Thus, it is now impossible to calculate the flow of foreign capital in and out of Mainland China.

Under the new reporting mechanism, the Shanghai and Shenzhen exchanges will not let investors know the net buying and selling data of the overall northbound (direction of mainland) funds or the flows for the top ten active stocks on a given day. The Hong Kong Stock Connect program has been adjusted accordingly.

The RFA quoted a scholar saying that data on foreign investment in China are critical long-term indicators that play an important role in observing the Chinese economy. The Chinese government understands that making the data regarding the country’s stock market more opaque will only lead to faster withdrawal of foreign capital from China, yet it has still taken this step, showing that there must not be much foreign investment left in the Chinese stock market. It seems that China is preparing measures to prevent the further withdrawal of foreign capital. This is just like how China stopped disclosing unemployment data when the unemployment rate was rising sharply.

The new disclosure mechanism makes it easier for the government to fabricate market data in accordance with its political and economic needs, influencing retail investors who do not have a full picture of the market.

Source: RFA, August 19, 2024
https://www.rfa.org/mandarin/yataibaodao/jingmao/ec-stockmarket-foreigncapitalwithdraws-08192024053127.html