Defense/Military - 74. page

On April 7, China Great Wall Industry Corporation (CGWIC), China’s flagship organization authorized by the government to provide satellite in-orbit delivery (IOD) services, commercial launch services and aerospace technology applications invited customers from countries including the United States, France, Germany,  the Philippines, and Hong Kong to the city of Xichang (which has a spaceport located about 64 km to the northwest) to commemorate the 20 year anniversary of China’s international space launch services. 

After receiving Hu Jintao’s approval, the Central Military Committee recently published an order “The Opinion on Strengthening Military Information Security Protection Under the New Situation.” The order outlines the following areas:
1) Strengthen the leadership for the information security protection and clarify each organization’s role and responsibilities, to establish an integrated and connected information security management system.
2) Improve the information security work mechanism and standardize procedures for security management, network security, and electromagnetic safety.
3) Establish an information security team.
4) Improve information security protection technology and methods.
5) Strengthen the management of information security protection, including management of human resources, information, network, critical weaponry equipments, and containers, sites, and activities that are related to security information

Source: Xinhua, April 6, 2010
http://news.xinhuanet.com/mil/2010-04/06/content_13306916.htm

Xinhua recently published an article suggesting that the military’s strategic delivery capability is an important measure for national military capacity. The current Chinese strategic delivery is lacking theoretical studies, capacity building, reserve forces and a traffic mobilization mechanism. Chinese command methods are far behind the US Global Transportation Network. Strategic delivery requires integration among land, air and sea, as well as integration between national military and civilian systems. The article suggested that China should (1) establish an overall command system, (2) take full advantage of China’s railway system, and (3) enhance the “Military Representative System” along transportation lines.

Source: Xinhua, March 11, 2010
http://news.xinhuanet.com/mil/2010-03/11/content_13145879.htm

According to China News Agency, the spokesperson of the Chinese Ministry of National Defense and the Chinese Military, Huang Xueping, said on February 25, 2010, “It is groundless and irresponsible to associate Internet hacking with the Chinese government and the army. This is hype with ulterior motives.”

Huang Xueping made the above remarks targeting the reports that the hackers attacking the Google website have a background with the Chinese government and the army.

“Chinese law prohibits any form of Internet hacking,” said Huang Xueping.

Source: China News Service, February 25, 2010
http://www.chinanews.com.cn/gn/news/2010/02-25/2138236.shtml

Xinhua’s International Herald Leader stated that China’s hawks should be nonviolent, rational, responsible and not "savagely combative." "Whose dream is this China’s dream? Is it the dream and pursuit of the Chinese people? The Chinese people dreams for a powerful China but do not necessary have the aspiration to become the No. 1 military power and eventually dominate the world. The book may sell well but lacks professionalism. As known to all, the No. 1 military power in the world is the United States, with its largest inventory of nuclear weapons. Whatever nuclear weapons China possesses is nothing compared to the United States. To become No. 1 means to surpass the United States and produce more nuclear weapons. Is this what China should do?" "Irresponsible remarks may sometimes be manipulated, leading to devastating consequences." "Any clear-cut expressions should not ignore the complexity of reality. Nor should they disregard the national image in the international community and our national long term interests." 

Xinhua recently republished an article by Hong Kong based Asia Times suggesting the more and more high-ranking Chinese military officers are standing up and “talking straight.” Examples are comments made by Major General Zhu Chenghu, Major General Luo Yuan, and Senior Colonel Ke Chunqiao, after the U.S. arms sales to Taiwan. They all suggested that China should sell U.S. bonds, increase military spending and expand military deployment. Retired Rear Admiral Yin Zhuo also suggested expanding the reach of the Chinese Navy by doing things like establishing a Navy base in the Middle East. All these military comments covered by the media started 15 years ago with General Xiong Guangkai, who told U.S. Ambassador Charles Freeman regarding nuclear wars, “You’d better worry more about Los Angeles than Taipei.”

Source: Xinhua, March 10, 2010
http://news.xinhuanet.com/mil/2010-03/10/content_13137034.htm

According to PLA Daily or China Military Online on March 11, 2010, “As information technology  improves in future warfare, it is no longer appropriate to continue to emphasize the scale of the enemy’s destruction. … Sometimes, destroying a system, a subsystem or even the enemy’s key equipment will disable the enemy’s resistance capability.”

“In several recent high-tech regional wars, the US-led multinational military forces almost always attacked an opponent’s command system first, which defeated the opponent completely before it could organize any decent resistance.”

“A more and more well-developed information network can compensate for the inadequacy of not setting up the task of destroying the enemy in terms of scale.”

Source: PLA Daily/China Military Online, March 11, 2010
http://www.chinamil.com.cn/jfjbmap/content/2010-03/11/content_22637.htm

Qiu Shi, the primary theoretical journal of the Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party, published an article on February 16, 2010, on the importance of patriotic Education in the armed forces. Below are the specific requirements for the patriotic education in the army:

“Strive to guide the majority of the military officers and soldiers to firmly hold the army’s soul, i.e., the Party’s absolute leadership over the army, wholeheartedly follow the Party and forever obey the Party.  Educate and guide them to regard the Party’s direction as the direction, the Party’s will as the will, and highly keep in line with the Party Central Committee.  Resolutely resist the wrong ideological trend of a ‘non-Partisan and apolitical Armed Forces’ and ‘nationalization of the Armed Forces’.”

Source: QiuShi, February 16, 2010
http://www.qstheory.cn/zxdk/2010/201004/201002/t20100209_20835.htm