Skip to content

LTN: U.S. Businesses Consider Leaving Hong Kong

Major Taiwanese news network Liberty Times Network (LTN) recently reported that, according to a member survey that the American Chamber of Commerce conducted in Hong Kong, around 53 percent of its members are considering leaving Hong Kong in the future, either near-term or mid-term. The survey was designed specifically to measure the impact of the Hong Kong National Security Law and the U.S. sanctions that followed. The survey sampled a total of 154 member companies of the Chamber. Most (55.84 percent) of the members recognized the long-term competitiveness of the Hong Kong based U.S. companies to be the top priority to evaluate. According to undisclosed sources, after the new law and the new U.S. sanctions, most of the “high net-worth individuals” in Hong Kong have not yet moved their money out of the city. They are still observing and evaluating the changes on local asset prices and the potential long-term business environment under the Mainland’s control. However, many of the wealthy people have completed the preparation work for a swift money move, such as opening off-shore bank accounts, obtaining overseas passports, and other means.

Source: LTN, August 13, 2020
https://ec.ltn.com.tw/article/breakingnews/3259577

China’s Summer Grain Acquisitions Fell, but State Reported Grain Harvest Was “Highest in History”

A government report showing the progress of summer grain acquisitions, released on Wednesday August 12, showed that wheat purchases in regions including Hebei, Jiangsu, Anhui, Shandong, and Henan dropped by 18 percent. However, the state media in Jiangsu and Henan announced “good news.” The media claimed that the summer grain harvest “stayed at the highest level in history.”

In the past few months, disastrous events have occurred in major agriculturally productive regions in China and crops have seen severe damage. However, Zhou Xuewen, the deputy Minister of Emergency Management and deputy Minister of Water Resources, boldly predicted at a recent press conference that the year 2020 will be a great year of harvest. He stated, “The year of flooding is often the year of harvest and will be the harvest of (double-crops and) late rice. Why? The water conditions are better, and the soil is fertile. Our disaster relief measures and our post-disaster recovery and reconstruction, along with our strengthened restoration and planting management, as well as some technologies being used, mean that I don’t think food will be affected this year.”

The website of the National Food and Strategic Reserves Administration published the progress of the summer grain purchases. As of August 5, the total purchase of wheat in the main producing areas was about 42.85 million tons, a drop of about 9.38 million tons, or 18 percent, on a year-on-year basis.

Between January and July, China suffered from the COVID-19 pandemic and severe flooding. Hubei, Anhui, and parts of Jiangsu were flooded. However, state media in those regions claimed that there was a grain harvest. The Jiangsu survey team of the National Bureau of Statistics released data on July 14 showing that the total output of summer grain was 25.2 billion jin (12.6 million tons), an increase of 3.6 percent over the previous year. The Henan team released data on July 17, showing that the total output of summer grains in the province reached 75.1 billion jin (37.5 million tons), around the highest level in history.

He Huiling, a farmer in Luoyang, Henan, told RFA that the drop in the purchase of summer grains is related to the reduction in grain production and the over-exploitation of arable land. “Excessive (real estate) development and excessive land acquisition have left many people with little land to grow crops. Farmers make a living by purchasing food. Many of our local lands have been confiscated.”

Another villager in Nanyang, Henan, told RFA that he does not have any residual food at all. The central government is advocating food conservation because it is worried about a food shortage, “Recently the central government has spoken out about saving food. In our hometown, there is no food in the house. The main reason is that there are fewer farmers. Another reason is the reduction in arable land.”

Source: Radio Free Asia, August 13, 2020
https://www.rfa.org/mandarin/yataibaodao/jingmao/ql1-08132020062337.html

Secret Document about Hiding Party Building in Overseas Offices

The Epoch Times obtained exclusive information from a secret document that the China National Petroleum Corporation (PetroChina) issued. The document addresses how the Chinese consulates have been playing active leadership roles in managing the development of the party in all of the company’s overseas offices. Petro China recently asked that all work of this type go underground.

Below is a translation of the notice:

Notice on Further Implementation of Requirements for Overseas Party Building.

With the recent U.S. and other western countries containment of the CCP, there have been incidents in Australia in which the Chinese personnel’s mobile phones, computers and other personal items were searched and taken away under the claim that they could contain materials about how to develop the CCP. The CCP has therefore asked the respective overseas agencies to destroy or transfer sensitive documents immediately. Based on the directives from senior management, a translation of the notice regarding the execution of the party’s development work in foreign offices is below.
1. Party cells in foreign offices are required to be active in their acceptance of the leadership of the party committee at the consulate, particularly for the Malaysia and Singapore offices in Southeast Asia and Saudi Arabia in the Middle East. They need to report their work to the consulate at least once a year. They also need to report major changes in contracts and personnel, and major events.
2. Foreign offices should sort out potential risks, study and develop emergency response plans, and establish emergency contact channels with the consulate and the company headquarters back in China. Offices in Australia and Canada must inform their consulate of their handling of urgent documents. Party members and cadres must strictly guard party secrets when a foreign country is doing an investigation of their work. This is an iron-clad rule.
3. The overseas party development work must be strictly safeguarded along with information about the party’s organizational structure, membership, member’s responsibilities, activities and internal documents. They must understand the distinction between internal and external information and must be flexible while maintaining confidentiality.
4. Overseas party cells need to plan party activities effectively based on the conditions in each situation. They should also establish flexible ways for the members to pay party membership fees and determine their meeting frequencies.
5. Overseas party cells should not publish their activities in social media including Weibo and Wechat. They should not publish talks and articles about party development work and shouldn’t accept media interviews. They should not transmit information that contains information about party membership, organizational structure and party development work using unsecure channels such as Wechat or email. They should not display the party flag, wear the party emblem, or have a bulletin board displaying party development work at their company location.
6. They must temporarily suspend the requirement for record keeping of overseas party development activities including performance assessments and inspections.
7. They must strengthen the management of highly confidential party development documents in their offices in countries such as the U.S., U.K, Australia, Canada and New Zealand. All the relevant electronic records stored in devices such as computers, cell phones, external hard drives, flash drives, and CDs must be deleted. Paper documents need to be destroyed. For any important records that can’t be destroyed, they must be sorted and stored in a safe place or turned over to their home office in China or the local consulate for storage.
8. All related personnel must delete PetroChina party development apps from their phones. A separate communication will be sent out in regard to the collection of the party membership fee.

Source: Epoch Times, August 14, 2020
https://www.epochtimes.com/gb/20/8/14/n12332073.htm

CCP Controlled Media Attacked Zuckerberg

The U.S. Congress held a hearing on the how the Chinese government steals U.S. Technology. Mark Zuckerberg, the co-founder of Facebook, was the only CEO among the four at the hearing who stated firmly that China definitely steals U.S. technology.

As a result, an article criticizing Zuckerberg was published widely on Chinese media. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) controls all media in China. The article was titled, “This ‘TikTok Slaughter Battle’ completely tore off Zuckerberg’s mask as the ‘Chinese people’s good son-in-law.’” Since the parents of Zuckerberg’s wife Priscilla Chan were Chinese refugees who fled Vietnam, Beijing had been calling Zuckerberg “the Chinese people’s good son-in-law.”

The article said that Mark Zuckerberg (of Facebook), Tim Cook of Apple, Sundar Pichai of Google, and Jeff Bezos of Amazon participated in the hearing remotely.

A congressman asked, “Do you think that the Chinese government steals U.S. technologies?”

Cook, “No.”

Pichai, “No.”

Bezos, “I only heard it on newspaper, but it didn’t happen to Amazon.”

Zuckerberg, “I believe that China’s stealing technology from U.S. tech companies is well-documented.”

The article then said that Zuckerberg had tried many things for several years to get Beijing to let Facebook enter China, but after he could not do it, he revealed his true face and, last year, became hostile towards China.

The article blamed him for having a double standard when closing several Facebook accounts, which Zuckerberg said to be connected to the Chinese government, for spreading “fake news” about Hong Kong; for using the “China threat” theory to promote his virtual currency; and for trying to destroy TikTok, his rival.

Source: 163.com, August 4, 2020
https://news.163.com/20/0804/14/FJ6NPPE60001899O.html

Manager of Huarong Needed One Hundred Houses to Store All His Graft

The case of Lai Xiaomin, ex-chair of the China Huarong Asset Management Co., Ltd. (CHAM), one of the largest financial asset management companies in the country, opened a session in a court in Tianjin on August 11. Lai was charged with bribery, corruption and bigamy. Lai pleaded guilty and repented in court.

It was alleged that, between 2008 and 2018, when Lai Xiaomin held the positions of the director of the General Office of the China Banking Regulatory Commission (CBRC) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) secretary and chair of CHAM, he illegally accepted property with a total value of more than 1.788 billion yuan (US$ 0.26 billion).

This figure may have broken the record for the amount of corruption among all indicted Chinese officials. Pan Lu, a former teacher from Suzhou, gave a vivid description of the 1.788 billion yuan, “The money weighs 20 tons in 100-yuan bills. A one-hundred-square-meter house is not big enough to store that much cash. A dedicated villa is needed.”

China’s Caixin Media reported that there are three “one hundreds” in Lai’s case, including more than one hundred houses, one hundred contacts (with high-up officials), and one hundred lovers. In addition, the investigators found 270 million yuan (US$ 38.9 million) in cash in Lai’s residence, setting a record for the amount of cash seized from corrupt personnel.

Pan believes that the Lai Xiaomin corruption case is not unusual, and pales in comparison with the amount of corruption in China’s red families, the families of top CCP officials. “We know that the amount of corruption in the families of CCP Standing Committee members has reached astronomical figures. Lai was simply sacrificed by the regime to show that the CCP has the ability to fight corruption. One should not believe that the CCP is bold and decisive in fighting corruption just because of Lai’s case.”

Source: Radio Free Asia, August 11, 2020
https://www.rfa.org/mandarin/yataibaodao/jingmao/hj-08112020141839.html

China’s Large-scale Digital Currency Testing

According to China’s English language official media CGTN, four major state-owned banks, including the Bank of China, China Construction Bank, the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, and the Agricultural Bank of China, have started testing digital currencies in Shenzhen, a signal of the upcoming introduction of the digital renminbi (the name of the Chinese currency).

Years ago, China formulated a plan for the central bank to issue legal digital currency. Since 2014, the government has planned to replace cash with digital currency, but has yet to announce a clear time table. On August 3, the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) announced that it would “actively and steadily advance the research and development of the legal digital currency” in the second half of the year. Back in 2016, Zhou Xiaochuan, then governor of the PBOC, China’s central bank, stated that he planned to spend 10 years to digitize the banknotes which have been in use in the country for more than 800 years.

The PBOC’s digital renminbi is temporarily named “DC/EP” (the abbreviation of “digital currency/electronic payment”). At present, the employees of some state-owned banks have begun to use it for transfers, payments, and other transactions.

Users, after registering in a mobile app, can use a digital wallet to recharge, withdraw, transfer and scan QR codes to pay. Transfer can be done only based the other party’s mobile phone number. The PBOC is studying a scenario of money transfer without a network.

Didi Chuxing, the country’s app-based transportation services giant, said last month, that it established a “strategic cooperation agreement” with the PBOC. With 450 million Didi users, the PBOC hopes to use this huge platform to test the application of digital renminbi in the field of smart travel. In addition, it is reported that Meituan, a food delivery platform that generates billions of dollars of daily transactions, is currently negotiating with PBOC on digital renminbi.

According to Mu Changchun, director of the Digital Currency Research Institute of the PBOC, who is regarded as one of the leaders of China’s digital currency plan, “As long as you and I have a DC/EP digital wallet on your mobile phone, you don’t even need the Internet. As long as your phone has power, you can transfer the digital currency from one person’s digital wallet to another by touching the two phones.”

In April this year, China announced that it will conduct internal testing of digital currency in four main locations — Shenzhen, Suzhou, Chengdu, and Beijing’s new satellite city Xiong’an. A PBOC official disclosed that a larger scale test will also be conducted during the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics to further evaluate the capabilities and risks of digital currencies through large-scale cross-border transactions.

Although the new currency is to be issued by the PBOC, ordinary people still need to deal with state-owned and commercial banks. In April, a screenshot of the digital currency wallet application test by the Agricultural Bank of China was circulated on the Internet. The screenshot is said to show a variety of functions, including QR code payment, remittance, currency exchange, and “touch” transfers. PBOC officials said that the digital currency will adopt a two-tier operating system. The PBOC will interface with commercial banks, and the commercial banks will be directly interfacing with ordinary people.

Although Beijing’s enthusiasm for digital currency began a few years ago, it is the Bitcoin market and the “Libra” digital currency plan that the US technology giant Facebook initiated that accelerated the process.

Mu Changchun said frankly in an open class, “If Libra is accepted by everyone and becomes a common payment tool, then it is completely possible for it, ultimately, to develop into a world-class super-sovereign currency.”  “In order to protect our currency sovereignty and legal currency status, we need to plan in advance.”

The digital renminbi being tested is the equivalent of paper currency in value and they may be exchanged freely with each other. Unlike Bitcoin and other encrypted digital currencies based on blockchain technology, the PBOC is the currency issuer and requires real name user registration. Senior officials at the PBOC stated that, after the introduction of digital currency, payment data will be anonymous, but this anonymity is “controllable” and the government and banks still have the right to inquire.

Wan Hui, the founding partner of Primitive Ventures, a blockchain investment institution, wrote in an article that, in the traditional sense, the central bank can only directly control the creation and destruction of the base currency, but can only exert indirect control over the broader money supply driven by credit flows. If digital legal tender is issued, the central bank may bypass commercial banks and regain direct control over currency creation or supply. She believes that this will allow China’s central bank structurally to centralize the power to formulate and implement related monetary policies, and it can affect social and economic activities at a more granular level.

Source: BBC Chinese, August 11, 2020
https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/simp/business-53722841

Western Media Support “Marxist Journalism” School in China

The National Pulse reported that Several U.S. corporations and media companies have been supported Tsinghua University’s Global Business Journalism School. However, that school aims to produce journalists who adhere to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP’s) standards of “Marxist Journalism” (applying Marxist theory to journalism).

The school’s financial supporters include Bank of America, Bloomberg, Deloitte, and the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation. Tsinghua University also claims the following Western media provide “talent, equipment, and internships” as part of a “long history of cooperation” with Tsinghua: The New York Times, CNN, Financial Times, Reuters, and Bloomberg.

An introductory letter to Tsinghua’s Global Business Journalism School outlines its purpose: to accomplish the “tasks for news media” outlined by the CCP Central Committee. The Dean of the journalism school indicated: “We should be committed to a firm and correct political orientation. Our school has been actively exploring the theory and practices of Marxist Journalism, namely, to applying Marxist theory in observing the world and in selecting and handling news production.”

As a result, alumni of the program frequently go on to work for the CCP’s main media outlets, including China Central Television (CCTV), Xinhua News Agency, China Daily, and the People’s Daily.

Source: The National Pulse, July 31, 2020

EXCLUSIVE: CNN and the New York Times Support Chinese Communist-Funded ‘Marxist Journalism’ School

Xi Jinping’s Instructions on Food Waste

On August 11, Xinhua News Agency reported that Xi Jinping, the General Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party, had recently issued an “important instruction” on food waste. Xi pointed out that the phenomenon of food waste is shocking and distressing! He added that, despite the harvest of the country’s grain production in recent years, it is necessary to have a sense of crisis for food management. The impact of the global corona virus epidemic has sounded the alarm. Xi Jinping emphasized the need to strengthen legislation and supervision, take effective measures, and establish a long-term mechanism to stop food waste.

It is a rare phenomenon that, in recent weeks, the supreme leader of China has repeatedly mentioned food management.

Source: People’s Daily, August 12, 2020
http://paper.people.com.cn/rmrb/html/2020-08/12/nw.D110000renmrb_20200812_1-01.htm