The Battle at Zhongnanhai
(Revised)
Since early 2012, when then Chongqing police Chief Wang Lijun, attempted to defect to the U.S., an intense political drama has been on display in China. This drama, titled “The Battle at Zhongnanhai,” has included multiple episodes, including the downfall of Bo Xilai, the smashing of “flies,” and the “tiger hunt” of Zhou Yongkang and Xu Caihou. Many people are expecting the next episode to be the capture of the “spider” (Jiang Zemin). [1]
Don’t underestimate the drama. It is a battle between China’s current top leader Xi Jinping and a former top leader, Jiang Zemin, with the full support of Jiang’s faction. Also, it breaks the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP’s) long tradition of confining their operations and in-fighting to a closed circle. It is the first time that the CCP has openly displayed its internal struggle on the world stage and it even uses the world stage to conduct its campaign.
Qiushi Theory: Comments on China’s Spokesperson Policy
Qiushi Theory published an article in which it commented on the current policy regarding spokespersons. The policy was developed in 1983. The article said that guidelines are needed that will provide a better definition of what information the spokespersons can share and the process they should follow. It pointed out that the abilities and qualifications of the spokespersons are also important. In addition to solid professional capabilities, they should hold a firm political stance and recognize political trends with political sensitivity. The article also suggested that the spokespersons should form a team to provide assistance. That team should: collect, study, and analyze different social information; be capable of making friends with the media; build a channel that will disseminate the information while collecting feedback from the public; build a network of teams that will act as messengers and who will circulate policies within their network; and collect information and voice opinions when needed.
Source: Qiushi Theory, August 8, 2014
http://www.qstheory.cn/zhuanqu/zywz/2014-08/08/c_1111986175.htm
People’s Daily: Foreign Companies Received Yellow Card for Seeking Monopoly Advantage
People’s Daily published an article about the recent anti-monopoly measures imposed on foreign companies doing businesses in China, including Microsoft, Qualcomm, Benz, and BMW. The article said that these companies were given favorable treatment during the initial period of China’s economic open door policy and gained an advantage in their respective markets but now they are using that advantage to exercise anti-competition practices. The article quoted the spokesperson from the Ministry of Commerce, who stated that the anti-monopoly measures were to promote fair competition and all companies, whether they are domestic or foreign, should be subject to punishment under this policy.
Source: People’s Daily, August 11, 2014
http://finance.people.com.cn/n/2014/0811/c1004-25440476.html
Qiushi Theory Published a Research Paper on Think Tank Development in China
Qiushi Theory published a research paper on think tank development in China. The Counsellor’s office of the state council put together a research team following the recent directions that Xi Jinping and Li Keqiang gave on think tank development. The paper stated that think tanks are a part of a country’s soft power. The role that Chinese think tanks are capable of playing, however, does not match the country’s growing economic status in the world. The project team studied the development of think tanks in China, how they compare with the renowned think tanks in the world, and the problems they face. The team provided recommendations for the future outlook of the think tanks’ development, how they can “increase their involvement in the development of public policy, as well their role in making the government policy process more scientific and democratic.”
As to the challenges that the paper highlighted, in 2012, there were 429 think tanks in China compared to 6,600 in the world. Of the top 50 think tanks in the world, only 3 of them were in China. While close to 90 percent of the think tanks in China are government sponsored, the rest of the think tanks, which are private, have barely any influence. Meanwhile the quality of the research of the think tanks in China is generally poor. They lack mechanisms for evaluation and recognition. In addition they lack a fair, competitive, and tolerant environment in which to work.
Source: Qiushi Theory, August 8, 2014
http://www.qstheory.cn/zhuanqu/zywz/2014-08/08/c_1111986086.htm
Chinese Ambassador to Russia on Sino-Russian Cultural Engagement
Xinhua News Agency Signs Cooperation Agreement with a Spanish Think Tank
Over 70 Percent of Provinces Have Publicly Stated Support for the Decision on Zhou Yongkang
People’s Daily published a news report on its website regarding which provinces, municipalities, and autonomous regions have expressed support for the central government’s decision to investigate [former politburo member] Zhou Yongkang [for his violations of "Party discipline"].