The global race to return astronauts to the Moon is entering a new phase, with the United States, China, Russia, and Europe pursuing different mission architectures shaped by their technological capabilities, budgets, and tolerance for risk.
In 2026, NASA revised its Artemis mission sequence, shifting Artemis III from a planned crewed lunar landing to a near-Earth-orbit rendezvous and docking demonstration. The first crewed lunar landing is now targeted for Artemis IV in 2028. Instead of relying on a single launch to carry both the crew and lunar payload, the revised approach calls for multiple launches and contributions from separate contractors, with spacecraft components assembled in space. Although this increases operational complexity, it allows individual launches to proceed or be postponed independently, providing greater flexibility and redundancy.
China’s publicly outlined plan calls for two separate launches to send the lunar lander and crewed spacecraft into lunar orbit, where they will rendezvous and dock before astronauts transfer to the lander. This approach avoids the need for a single massive launch vehicle and reduces some risks associated with prolonged assembly in low Earth orbit. However, it places greater demands on docking precision, autonomous spacecraft control, and crew decision-making.
Russia, facing budget constraints, is moving away from an entirely independent crewed lunar program and toward integrating existing technologies, with greater emphasis on maintaining a crewed presence in lunar orbit.
Europe is contributing the European Service Module, which provides power and propulsion for NASA’s Orion spacecraft. This gives Europe a role in lunar exploration without requiring it to shoulder the full cost of developing launch vehicles and lunar landers.
These approaches reflect different strategic trade-offs. NASA is accepting greater complexity in exchange for flexibility and redundancy, while China’s more streamlined mission sequence demands greater precision and leaves less room for error. Rather than converging on a single model, the next era of lunar exploration is taking shape through competing technological architectures.
Source: People’s Daily, November 11, 2026
http://finance.people.com.cn/n1/2026/1111/c1004-40831626.html