Chinese State Media Highlight U.S. Anti-War Protests; Some Organizers Linked to CCP-Connected Donor Network
A report by Voice of America states that Chinese state media have extensively highlighted anti-war demonstrations in the United States following U.S. strikes against Iran. Major outlets such as Xinhua News Agency, China Central Television, People’s Daily, and the Global Times (Huanqiu Times) reported on protests in multiple American cities and emphasized calls from activists urging Washington to halt military action. Their coverage portrayed the demonstrations as evidence of significant domestic opposition within the United States to the conflict with Iran and framed the protests as reflecting growing public dissatisfaction with U.S. foreign policy and military involvement abroad.
The article notes that some U.S. media outlets and analysts have raised questions about the organizations involved in organizing the protests. Groups such as the ANSWER Coalition, The People’s Forum, and Code Pink were identified as key organizers of the demonstrations. Previous investigative reporting by The New York Times indicated that several of these groups have financial or organizational links to a funding network associated with businessman Neville Roy Singham, who has lived in Shanghai and supported initiatives promoting narratives favorable to China. According to the report, these connections have drawn increasing scrutiny in Washington, where policymakers and analysts are concerned about potential foreign influence networks that may amplify political messaging aligned with the interests of the Chinese Communist Party.
Source: VOA, March 5, 2026
https://www.voachinese.com/a/chinese-state-media-promotes-anti-war-demonstrations-in-the-us-us-media-protest-organizers-linked-to-a-donor-with-ties-to-ccp-20260304/8121283.html
China’s Solar Industry Battles Severe Overcapacity Amid Calls for Structural Reform
China’s solar energy sector is grappling with one of the most acute cases of “involution” — the term used to describe destructive, low-return competition — in the country’s economy today. While global annual demand for new solar capacity stands at approximately 700 gigawatts (GW), China’s domestic production capacity has ballooned to around 1,400 GW, roughly double what the world needs each year.
During China’s annual “Two Sessions” legislative meetings, Zhong Baoshen, chairman of leading solar manufacturer LONGi Green Energy and a delegate to the National People’s Congress, called for the establishment of a capacity exit mechanism to help the industry escape its current downward spiral. He warned that after China’s newly installed solar capacity peaks at over 300 GW in 2025, installations could face a cyclical decline in 2026, with the structural imbalance between supply and demand still unresolved.
Zhong proposed using efficiency standards as a benchmark — specifically photovoltaic conversion rates — to guide the retirement of outdated production capacity and align industry-wide output with actual market demand. He also criticized companies that lack genuine innovation, relying instead on poaching talent for quick capacity expansion while using non-competitive resources to undercut prices, ultimately squeezing out firms that invest in real technological advancement.
In a notable policy parallel, Zhong urged regulators to apply a framework similar to the real estate sector’s “three red lines” — a set of financial thresholds introduced to curb excessive borrowing among property developers. He recommended monitoring solar companies’ debt-to-asset ratios, net debt levels, and short-term repayment ability, imposing financing restrictions on non-compliant firms and encouraging industry consolidation.
On the policy front, China’s Ministry of Finance has already announced the elimination of VAT export tax rebates for solar products, effective April 1, a measure industry experts view as a signal against cutthroat, low-price competition in overseas markets.
Source: Central News Agency (Taiwan), March 4, 2026
https://www.cna.com.tw/news/acn/202603040248.aspx
China’s Belt and Road Initiative Investments in Africa Hit Record Highs Amid Global Trade Tensions
Africa emerged as the top destination for Chinese Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) investment in 2025, marking what analysts describe as the most active year for the initiative since its launch in 2013. According to a joint report released on January 18 by Griffith University’s Asia Institute and Fudan University’s Green Finance and Development Center, China’s total investment and construction contracts in Africa surged to $61.2 billion in 2025, a staggering 283 percent year-on-year increase, pushing Africa ahead of the Middle East as the initiative’s largest recipient region.
The report attributes the growth primarily to large-scale infrastructure projects financed through Chinese policy banks, including the Export-Import Bank and the China Development Bank. Unlike earlier BRI investments focused narrowly on roads and bridges, 2025’s projects are more deeply integrated with industrial parks and local resource development, aligning with African nations’ demands for domestic value chain upgrades.
The year was described as both the “dirtiest and greenest” for Chinese energy engagement in Africa. Fossil fuels remained central, with a $23 billion (approximately $23 billion USD) investment agreement in the Republic of Congo aimed at boosting oil output, and a $20 billion (approximately $20 billion USD) natural gas industrial park deal in Nigeria. At the same time, investment in copper, cobalt, and other critical minerals reached a record $32.6 billion, while green energy projects, including solar, wind, and a major green hydrogen initiative in Nigeria led by LONGi Green Energy, saw significantly increased activity.
Africa is also serving as a strategic manufacturing hub for Chinese firms seeking to sidestep U.S. tariffs. Morocco, benefiting from a U.S. free trade agreement and facing only a 10 percent U.S. tariff rate, has attracted a wave of Chinese factory relocations, including Bowey Alloys’ $150 million special alloy materials plant and Hangzhou Radix Energy’s $30 million automotive bearing facility in Tangier.
From 2013 through end-2025, cumulative BRI construction contracts totaled $837 billion and non-financial investment reached $561 billion, bringing total engagement to $1.399 trillion. The report anticipates continued expansion in 2026, focused on energy, mining, and emerging technologies.
Source: Radio France International, February 27, 2026
https://rfi.my/CTr1
China’s Military Warns of Internal Espionage Threats Following Iran Strike
The assassination of Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei by a joint U.S.-Israeli operation has sent shockwaves through Beijing, prompting China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to issue a series of stark warnings about the dangers of foreign infiltration and espionage.
On March 2, the PLA Daily‘s official commentary studio, “Junzhengping,” published a piece on Weibo titled “The Silent Shadow War: Everyone Must Stay Vigilant.” The commentary argued that as global competition intensifies, methods such as infiltration, intelligence theft, and subversion have become standard tools of “certain forces” seeking to sow instability from within. The piece drew a direct lesson from Iran’s downfall, stating that “the most fortified strongholds are often breached from the inside.”
The commentary warned Chinese citizens against complacency in everyday interactions, noting that casually mentioning sensitive information could hand adversaries the missing piece of an intelligence puzzle, accepting minor gifts or favors could open the door to manipulation, and taking seemingly friendly conversation at face value could allow bad actors to map out vulnerabilities.
China’s Ministry of State Security, the piece noted, publishes new cases of foreign espionage activity almost daily. The article urged every citizen to “stay alert, hold the line, and distinguish right from wrong,” so as to weave a security network that is “round-the-clock and without blind spots,” leaving no room for infiltration or subversion to take hold.
This followed an earlier PLA Daily commentary published on February 28, which called on “every Chinese son and daughter” to internalize the principle of never forgetting danger in times of peace. Only by “staying attuned to risk and preparing before the storm arrives,” it said, can China safeguard the hard-won stability it has achieved.
Source: Central News Agency (Taiwan), March 3, 2026
https://www.cna.com.tw/news/acn/202603030295.aspx
Chinese Media’s Reports During the First Couple of Days of the U.S. Attack on Iran
Creaders.Net, a Chinese-language website based in the United States, collected screenshots of reports from several Chinese media outlets covering the first couple of days following the U.S. attack on Iran. Many of these reports echoed the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP’s) propaganda narrative, suggesting that the United States would find it difficult to win the conflict and that Iran was capable of effectively fighting back.
On February 28, some outlets reported that Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei had survived an assassination attempt. After his death was later confirmed, some media cited experts claiming that he had already transferred his authority beforehand and that his death would therefore have limited impact on Iran’s national decision-making.
Guancha Observer:
“Huang Jin (commentator): The United States has made very poor preparations for this war; the U.S. military is an army that lacks confidence the most among all armies.”
China Daily:
“A video published by foreign media on March 1 shows several fireballs flying across the night sky over Dubai, passing above brightly lit skyscrapers.”
Xi’an City’s Radio and Television:
“Iran Fights Back – Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps issued its seventh statement declaring that Iran was carrying out retaliatory strikes.”
Dajiangkankan website:
“Photos from the scene: An Iranian missile broke through Israel’s defenses and struck Jerusalem. A building was directly hit, leaving a crater about 10 meters deep; people were screaming and running away.”
China Central Television (CCTV-4):
“Li Shaoxian, Honorary Dean of the Institute of Arab Studies at Ningxia University: Khamenei had already transferred his authority in advance, so his death would have only limited impact on Iran’s national decision-making.”
Beijing Times:
“Expert analysis: Khamenei may have already transferred his authority earlier, meaning his death would have only a limited effect on Iran’s decision-making.”
People’s Daily:
“Iranian Missile Hits Israel’s General Staff Headquarters.” “Images released by Iran show that the building housing Israel’s General Staff headquarters was struck early in the morning on March 1 and engulfed in flames.”
Direct News:
“Expert prediction: Khamenei survived the first assassination attempt; the United States and Israel will face a much more difficult situation moving forward.”
Shenzhen National Defense Channel:
“On February 28, Israel’s initial assessment suggested that the joint U.S.–Israeli attempt to assassinate Khamenei and Iran’s President Masoud Pezeshkian had failed. Khamenei may have already relocated, and Iran’s intelligence operations have changed significantly since last year. He had already left his office.”
Observing Pupil Channel on Bilibili:
“Shen Yi, a professor of international politics at Fudan University, analyzed Israel’s assessment, saying that the assassination attempt against Khamenei and the Iranian president had failed.”
Zhihu:
Jin Canrong (CCP leaders’ policy advisor): “Trump may have made a strategic mistake this time. The assassination attempt by the United States and Israel failed, and Iran now has four possible ways to retaliate.”
Hubei Daily:
“On the evening of March 1, Iran reportedly launched another strike on a U.S. military base in Bahrain. Heavy smoke was seen over the capital Manama, and local media reported that the site on fire was the U.S. base.”
Source: Creaders.Net, March 3, 2026
https://news.creaders.net/china/2026/03/03/2977362.html
U.S. Actions in Middle East and Beyond Seen as Strategic Moves Against China
Growing instability in the Middle East following U.S. and Israeli military operations against Iran is raising serious concerns about the impact on China’s energy security and broader geopolitical ambitions, according to analysts in Hong Kong.
Writing in Ming Pao, Hong Kong analyst and former editor-in-chief of the Hong Kong Economic Journal Chen Jingxiang noted that China is Iran’s largest oil customer, purchasing more than 80 percent of Iran’s oil exports. Since the outbreak of hostilities, Iran has announced a blockade of the Strait of Hormuz — a critical chokepoint through which approximately one-third of China’s crude oil supply passes. A sustained closure of this vital energy corridor could significantly disrupt China’s energy supply.
Beyond energy, Iran holds a key strategic position in China’s Belt and Road Initiative. A cooperation agreement signed between the two countries in 2016 deepened collaboration in transportation, railways, and energy. The outbreak of conflict now threatens to seriously undermine China’s investments and interests in Iran.
Iran is also an important political ally of China. Tehran joined the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation — a China-led bloc — in 2023, with Chinese state media at the time hailing the move as an opportunity for Iran to better realize its geoeconomic potential. China’s broader circle of strategic partners includes Russia, North Korea, and Pakistan.
The article argues that U.S. actions targeting Venezuela and Iran — both among China’s top oil suppliers — as well as Washington’s intervention in Panama Canal port operations, are part of a coherent strategy aimed at weakening China’s global influence.
Despite President Trump’s frequent public praise of Chinese leader Xi Jinping and his characterization of Xi as a “good friend,” the analyst contends that Washington’s actual moves are consistently aimed at undermining Beijing. China, the article concludes, should harbor no excessive expectations for the Trump-Xi summit scheduled later this month.
Source: Central News Agency (Taiwan), March 4, 2026
https://www.cna.com.tw/news/acn/202603040045.aspx
Hu Xijin: The Netherlands, This “Petty Bandit,” Must Pay the Price for Its Action
Hu Xijin, formal chief editor of China’s state-run media Global Times, published an editorial
article following a court ruling of Netherlands on February 11, ordering a formal investigation
into the socalled “mismanagement” at Nexperia. Below is an excerpt of the article:
“A court of appeal in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, issued a ruling ordering a formal
investigation into the socalled “mismanagement” at Nexperia. The ruling also upholds the
Dutch government’s earlier decision to suspend the company’s Chinese CEO, Zhang Xuezheng,
and allows the European interim management team to remain in place. This is undoubtedly a
political ruling—using the law as a tool to legitimize what amounts to a ‘coup’ by the Dutch
government against Nexperia.
“The court stated that it had ‘sufficient grounds’ to question Nexperia’s policies and business
conduct, claiming there were ‘indications’ that CEO Zhang had ‘unilaterally changed the
company’s strategy’ in response to U.S. exportcontrol pressures. According to the court, under
Wingtech’s control, there were signs that Nexperia failed to comply with agreements made
with the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs and took steps to marginalize or dismiss European
managers.
“Wingtech Technology issued a statement expressing ‘extreme disappointment and strong
dissatisfaction’ with the ruling, emphasizing that it would continue to defend its rights through
all legal means.
“In recent months, many European countries and Canada have accelerated commercial
engagement with China, with visiting Western leaders signing trade agreements to stabilize and
expand economic ties. The U.S., after intense friction last year, has also entered a trade truce
with China and adjusted its strategy. However, the Dutch ruling pushes the Netherlands back
into confrontation with China, preventing the ‘Nexperia turmoil’ from settling. With several
Chinahawk politicians entering the new Dutch cabinet, the ruling is seen as a signal that the
Netherlands will continue its irrational China policy.”
The article argues that the Dutch government appears confused about its own interests and
how to defend them. “China’s scale is not in the same league as the Netherlands, and we have
experienced and seen far more. When dealing with the Netherlands, this ‘little bandit’ and
‘little bully,’ our capability and endurance are destined to be inexhaustible.” “The Netherlands,
will have to pay a price for its action.”
Source: Sina, February 12, 2026
https://www.sina.cn/news/detail/5265619327918245.html
CNA: Xinhua News Agency Released a New List of Prohibited Terms, Emphasizing Taiwan Is a Province of China
Xinhua News Agency recently released a new batch of prohibited terms, covering five major
categories: social life, legal matters, ethnic and religious issues, matters involving territorial
sovereignty and Hong Kong–Macau–Taiwan, and international relations.
In the category concerning territory, sovereignty, and Hong Kong–Macau–Taiwan, there are 13
prohibited expressions. Xinhua states that “Hong Kong and Macau are Special Administrative
Regions of China, and Taiwan is a province of China. In all written texts, maps, and charts,
special care must be taken not to refer to them as ‘countries.’” This is especially important
when listing multiple countries and regions together, where the phrase “countries and regions”
must not be omitted.
For the names of Taiwan’s governmental institutions, quotation marks should be used when
they cannot be avoided, such as Taiwan’s “Legislative Yuan,” “Executive Yuan,” “Control Yuan,”
and “Election Commission.” Terms such as “central,” “national,” or “Chinese Taipei” must not
appear; if they must be used, they should be placed in quotation marks, such as Taiwan
“Central Bank,” Taiwan “Premier,” or “Legislator.” Institutions like Taiwan “Tsinghua University”
and the Taiwan “National Palace Museum” should also be placed in quotation marks.
“It is strictly forbidden to refer to the leader of the Taiwan region as the ‘President (Vice
President) of the Republic of China,’ even with quotation marks.”
Other prohibited expressions include: Taiwan’s socalled “laws” should be described as “relevant
regulations of the Taiwan region.” In matters involving crossStrait legal affairs, terms from
international law such as “document authentication,” “judicial assistance,” or “extradition”
must not be used.
The two sides of the Taiwan Strait and Hong Kong must not be collectively referred to as “the
two sides of the Strait and the three regions.” The phrase “Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan
tourists traveling to China” should be expressed as “Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan tourists
traveling to the mainland.” “Taiwan” corresponds to “the mainland (or the motherland’s
mainland),” and “Hong Kong and Macau” correspond to “the mainland,” and these concepts
must not be confused.
Additional prohibited expressions include placing Taiwan, Hong Kong, or Macau alongside China
as parallel entities, such as “China–Hong Kong” or “China–Taiwan.” Instead, one should use
expressions like “the mainland and Taiwan” or “Fujian and Taiwan.”
Source: CNA, February 27, 2026
https://www.cna.com.tw/news/acn/202602270111.aspx