Meta AI’s Launch on Threads Revealed China as Meta’s Second-Largest Country in Advertising Revenue and Scam Ads
On May 28, Meta officially launched Meta AI on Threads. Instead of casual conversations, many users questioned the chatbot about Meta’s business practices, including scam advertisements, revenue sources, and the company’s financial ties to Chinese advertisers.
When asked why Meta continues to earn substantial revenue from China despite Facebook and Instagram being blocked in mainland China, Meta AI responded that Chinese companies heavily purchase Meta advertisements to market products to consumers in North America, Europe, and Southeast Asia.
According to information cited by Meta AI from Meta’s financial reports, revenue from Chinese advertisers reached $18.35 billion in 2024, accounting for more than 11 percent of Meta’s total revenue and making China its second-largest source of advertising income after the United States. Chinese cross-border e-commerce companies such as Temu and Shein were identified as major advertising clients.
More controversially, Meta AI cited external reports claiming that a significant portion of China-linked advertisements involved scam, gambling, or adult-related content, potentially generating more than $3 billion in revenue for Meta. When users asked why Meta continued allowing such advertisements, Meta AI reportedly responded that scam ads remain highly profitable. The chatbot referenced claims that Meta balances anti-fraud enforcement against potential revenue losses and may limit crackdowns if advertising revenue declines beyond certain thresholds. According to the cited figures, scam-related advertisements generated approximately $16 billion in 2024, or about 10 percent of Meta’s total revenue.
Source: Aboluo, June 3, 2026
https://www.aboluowang.com/2026/0603/2391203.html
Quad Launches Fiji Port Project to Counter China’s Growing Influence in the South Pacific
The foreign ministers of the United States, Australia, India, and Japan — the members of the Quad security dialogue — recently announced plans to jointly develop a major port project in Fiji valued at approximately $1.8 billion. Analysts said the move reflects the Quad’s evolution from a diplomatic dialogue platform toward a more concrete security framework aimed at countering China’s expanding influence in the South Pacific.
The announcement followed the Quad foreign ministers’ meeting in New Delhi on May 26. The Fiji port project will be the Quad’s first joint infrastructure initiative since the group’s establishment. The project has drawn attention because Suva, Fiji’s capital, hosts the country’s largest port and naval base and is regarded as a strategic transportation hub in the South Pacific.
Observers noted that around 100 Chinese fishing vessels currently operate from Suva Port, while the Chinese naval tracking ship Yuan Wang 7 has previously docked there. Analysts argued that the initiative reflects efforts to prevent Beijing from gaining control over critical infrastructure beyond the First Island Chain and into the broader Pacific region.
Fiji has accumulated significant debt to Chinese state-owned banks through earlier Belt and Road infrastructure projects, while analysts believe Beijing has used dual-use civilian infrastructure projects to gradually expand its strategic presence across Pacific island nations.
Source: Epoch Times, June 1, 2026
https://www.epochtimes.com/gb/26/6/1/n14779721.htm
Chinese Media: Nvidia–Unitree Partnership Does Not Undermine China’s Technological Independence in Robotics
On June 1, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang announced a partnership with Chinese robotics company Unitree Robotics to launch the “H2+” humanoid robot reference design. Under the cooperation, Unitree provides the humanoid robot platform, while Nvidia supplies AI computing systems, robotics foundation models, and simulation support. The collaboration has drawn international attention because Unitree was added to the U.S. Department of Defense’s “Chinese Military Companies” list earlier this year over concerns about potential dual-use military applications.
The partnership has also sparked debate within China. Some commentators warned that amid U.S. export restrictions, reliance on Nvidia could leave China’s robotics sector dependent on foreign core technologies, making that Chinese firms primarily manufacturing providers without control over key technologies.
National Business Daily (NBD), a Chinese media, defended the partnership, arguing that it reflects a “complementary and mutually beneficial” relationship rather than one-sided dependence. It argues that Unitree’s strengths lie in humanoid robot hardware, motion control, engineering integration, and large-scale manufacturing, while Nvidia provides advantages in AI computing platforms, robotics foundation models, and software ecosystems. It calls the cooperation as “Nvidia provides the brain, while Unitree provides the body.”
The partnership could help Unitree expand internationally by leveraging Nvidia’s global ecosystem and influence. Unitree’s hardware platforms may gain broader access to overseas universities, research institutions, and developers, helping the company strengthen international recognition and accelerate technological iteration.
At the same time, Unitree can retain significant technological autonomy. The company reportedly plans to raise 4.2 billion yuan (approximately US$620 million) through its IPO process, with nearly half allocated to robotics model research and development. The rise of other Chinese humanoid robotics firms and domestic AI companies could further diversify China’s technological base and reduce long-term foreign dependences.
Source: NBD, June 7, 2026
https://www.nbd.com.cn/articles/2026-06-07/4419266.html
African Countries Tighten Control Over Critical Minerals, Challenging China’s Resource Strategy
Over the past year, at least 12 African countries — including the Democratic Republic of Congo, Zimbabwe, Mozambique, and Kenya — have introduced sweeping new policies aimed at tightening state control over critical mineral resources. The measures include bans on raw ore exports, mandatory local processing requirements, state equity participation in mining projects, and restrictions on foreign involvement in mining-related industries.
Analysts say the shift is being driven by the global energy transition, which has sharply increased demand for lithium, cobalt, nickel, and rare earth minerals used in electric vehicles, energy storage, and defense industries. Many African governments now view raw mineral exports as unequal arrangements that leave most profits to foreign processors. Indonesia’s success after banning nickel ore exports has become a key reference point, demonstrating how export restrictions can help build domestic processing industries and attract foreign investment.
The African Union’s 2025 African Green Minerals Strategy further encouraged local processing and industrial upgrading. At the same time, growing geopolitical competition over critical minerals has intensified external pressure. The United States and European Union have expanded investment and infrastructure cooperation in Africa while encouraging resource diversification away from China.
The policy shift is creating major challenges for Chinese mining companies. Export restrictions, state ownership requirements, local hiring quotas, technology transfer demands, and stricter environmental regulations are increasing operational costs and disrupting supply chains. As a result, many Chinese firms are accelerating supply-chain localization in Africa by building local smelting and refining facilities. However, Chinese commentators argue that higher-value segments — such as battery-grade lithium salts, ternary precursor materials, and advanced magnetic materials — should remain concentrated in China to preserve the core technological value of the supply chain.
Source: Net Ease, June 2, 2026
https://www.163.com/dy/article/KUES8MLQ05568TV3.html
Analysis: Confucius Institutes Continue Influencing U.S. Schools Under New Identities
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) launched Confucius Institutes in 2004, partnering with American universities and K-12 schools to promote Chinese language and cultural programs in the United States. In recent years, the institutes faced widespread criticism and closures over concerns about propaganda and foreign influence. However, analysts argue that some of these networks have reemerged under new organizational identities to continue promoting CCP influence in U.S. education.
Jennifer Richmond of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies wrote in The Hill that many former Confucius Institute networks have survived by rebranding themselves as nonprofit cultural and educational exchange organizations. Citing a 2022 report by the National Association of Scholars, she argued that some programs continue operating through renamed entities while maintaining ties with Chinese government institutions.
One example is the Virginia-based nonprofit Center for Bridging Cultures, which reportedly places Chinese teachers in U.S. classrooms, organizes China exchange trips, and partners with schools and universities. Public records show links between the organization and the former Confucius Institute network. Gao Qing, its executive director previously led the Confucius Institute U.S. Center, which the U.S. State Department designated in 2020 as a Chinese foreign mission linked to Beijing’s overseas influence operations.
The article argued that current U.S. transparency laws leave significant loopholes because schools are not required to fully disclose relationships with nonprofit organizations operating on behalf of foreign entities. Richmond called for stronger oversight of nonprofit groups linked to CCP influence networks.
Source: Epoch Times, June 2, 2026
https://www.epochtimes.com/gb/26/6/1/n14779990.htm
China Removes Over 300,000 Law Enforcement Personnel Amid Fiscal Pressure
China’s Ministry of Justice recently announced that a nationwide rectification campaign had resulted in the removal or reassignment of more than 300,000 unqualified administrative law enforcement personnel within one year, while more than 7,000 non-compliant enforcement entities were shut down.
According to The Beijing News, Vice Minister of Justice Hu Weilie stated on May 21 that authorities had also eliminated more than 400,000 unnecessary enforcement items. He added that local governments had waived over 11 billion yuan in fines during the campaign. At the same time, Hu acknowledged that problems such as arbitrary enforcement, selective non-enforcement, disproportionate punishments, and “fines without supervision” continue to occur.
Despite official claims of progress in “standardizing law enforcement,” many observers remain skeptical. A commentator argued that the campaign serves two main purposes: reducing fiscal burdens by cutting large numbers of temporary or outsourced personnel, and shifting blame for public dissatisfaction onto lower-level enforcement staff rather than addressing deeper systemic problems within the central authorities.
Source: Epoch Times, May 25, 2026
https://www.epochtimes.com/gb/26/5/24/n14773451.htm
AI Analysis Suggests Xi Jinping’s “Sadness” Has Increased Dramatically Over the Past Decade
Japan’s Yomiuri Shimbun reported that Taiwanese Academia Sinica researcher Tsai Wen-hsuan has found Xi Jinping’s “sadness” increased significantly over the past ten years.
Tsai has long used artificial intelligence to analyze publicly available footage from Chinese state media programs such as China Central Television’s (CCTV’s) Xinwen Lianbo, focusing on Xi’s emotions, physical condition, and overall demeanor. According to Tsai’s AI-based analysis comparing Xi’s appearances at military parades in 2015 and 2025, indicators associated with “sadness” rose from 17.3 percent to 48.6 percent, while “disgust” increased from 5.8 percent to 13.6 percent.
Tsai linked these changes to political turmoil within the Chinese military leadership. Ahead of the September 2025 military parade, nine PLA generals — including former Central Military Commission (CMC) Vice Chairman He Weidong and former Political Work Department Director Miao Hua, both regarded as Xi allies — were expelled from the Communist Party and military and transferred for prosecution on the same day. Outside observers widely believed the move was orchestrated by CMC Vice Chairman Zhang Youxia. However, on January 24, 2026, Xi removed Zhang Youxia and CMC Joint Staff Department Chief Liu Zhenli, a move many analysts interpreted as Xi’s counterattack against Zhang.
Source: Epoch Times, May 29, 2026
https://www.epochtimes.com/gb/26/5/29/n14776689.htm
EU Launches In-Depth Investigation into JD.com’s Planned Acquisition of Ceconomy
On May 28, the European Union announced an in-depth investigation into Chinese e-commerce giant JD.com’s proposed acquisition of German electronics retailer Ceconomy, citing concerns that the deal may have benefited from Chinese state subsidies. The European Commission said its preliminary review indicated that “JD.com may have received foreign subsidies that distort the EU internal market.” Brussels will assess whether such subsidies enabled JD.com to offer an unusually high bid for Ceconomy, potentially influencing the acquisition process and distorting competition within the EU market.
JD.com denied that the transaction would be financed through subsidies and stated that it had not received any support that could distort competition in Europe. Reuters reported last July that JD.com planned to launch a voluntary public takeover offer for Ceconomy shareholders at 4.60 euros per share, valuing the company at more than 2.2 billion euros.
Ceconomy owns Europe’s largest consumer electronics retail chains, MediaMarkt and Saturn, operating around 1,000 stores across multiple European countries, as well as one of Europe’s largest online electronics platforms. In fiscal year 2023–24, the company employed about 50,000 people and generated annual revenue of 22.4 billion euros, including 5.1 billion euros from online sales. JD.com CEO Sandy Xu said the acquisition aims to build “Europe’s leading next-generation consumer electronics platform.”
Source: Deutsche Welle, May 28, 2026
https://www.dw.com/zh/对京东收购德国电子零售商-欧盟启动深入调查/a-77333845