After Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro was reportedly captured by U.S. forces and transferred to the U.S. judicial system, Chinese state media moved quickly to denounce the action as “blatant hegemonic behavior.” On January 4, Xinhua published a sharply worded commentary that was widely republished by mainland Chinese media outlets. Notably, many of these platforms left their comment sections open, allowing an unusual surge of intense and openly hostile anti-U.S. sentiment to appear.
Observers note that Chinese authorities typically restrict or close comment sections when online discussions become excessively heated or deviate from the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) preferred narrative. The rare tolerance for high-intensity commentary in this case has prompted speculation that the response was guided within China’s propaganda system.
Analysts say Beijing often employs a dual-track approach on sensitive U.S.-related issues: state media establish the official political framing—casting events as examples of U.S. hegemony or foreign interference—while public comment sections are temporarily loosened to amplify nationalist and anti-U.S. emotions. Scholars caution that this does not indicate a genuine expansion of free expression but rather a controlled release of public sentiment, with comment threads frequently dominated by repetitive, slogan-like messages—possibly posted by the CCP controlled fifty-cents party members—intended to shape broader public opinion.
Source: Epoch Times, January 5, 2026
https://www.epochtimes.com/gb/26/1/5/n14669445.htm