Skip to content

Government/Politics

The Eighth China–U.S. Sister Cities Conference Held in San Francisco

The Eighth China–U.S. Sister Cities Conference was held in San Francisco on June 5 under the theme “Working Together to Promote High-Quality Development of China–U.S. Cities.”

People’s Daily described the event as an important bilateral dialogue following the recent meeting between Trump and Xi Jinping in Beijing. The conference brought together more than 150 representatives from 15 Chinese provincial-level regions and 12 cities, as well as 160 representatives from 21 U.S. states and 36 cities.

Participants exchanged views on green development and urban governance, culture and tourism, and education and youth engagement. During the conference, Chinese and U.S. cities signed five cooperation agreements and showcased 31 collaborative projects covering sister-city partnerships, cultural and tourism exchanges, and youth programs.

Analysts have been pointed out that the Chinese Communist Party’s United Front Work Department has used subnational exchange programs, including sister-city and sister-province relationships, to expand political influence and cultivate local networks within the United States.

Source: People’s Daily, June 8, 2026
https://paper.people.com.cn/rmrb/pc/content/202606/08/content_30161744.html

China’s State Media Reporter in Czech Republic Charged with Espionage-Related Offense

Yang Yiming, the Prague correspondent for Chinese state-run newspaper Guangming Daily, is set to stand trial after being detained for four months in the Czech Republic. Czech prosecutors accused Yang of working for Chinese intelligence services and charged him with “conducting unauthorized activities for a foreign power,” marking the first prosecution under the country’s espionage-related legislation. If convicted, he could face up to five years in prison.

According to Czech authorities, Yang allegedly monitored and collected intelligence on political and academic figures in the Czech Republic, including pro-Taiwan politicians such as Czech Senate President Miloš Vystrčil and former Speaker of the Chamber of Deputies Markéta Pekarová Adamová. Investigators said he sought to gather compromising information on these individuals on behalf of Chinese intelligence agencies.

Yang had reportedly operated in the Czech Republic for years under the identity of a journalist and had interviewed numerous Czech and Slovak political figures. Czech authorities had repeatedly renewed his press credentials and residency permits before the investigation was launched.

Source: Central News Agency (Taiwan), June 3, 2026
https://www.cna.com.tw/news/aopl/202606030328.aspx

Why Is Beijing Using Coast Guard Patrols Instead of Warships Near Taiwan?

On May 28, 2026, Japan and the Philippines announced the start of negotiations over the delimitation of their exclusive economic zones and continental shelves in waters east and southeast of Taiwan. On June 1, China’s Coast Guard announced that the Daishan vessel (2502) task group had conducted “law enforcement patrols” east of Taiwan, describing the operation as a response to the Japan–Philippines maritime negotiations.

Sources cited by The Epoch Times said the patrols were aimed less at military deterrence and more at increasing political and psychological pressure on Taiwan. One source close to the Chinese military claimed Beijing recognizes that such operations are unlikely to intimidate Taiwan’s government directly and is instead seeking to influence Taiwanese public opinion ahead of the 2028 presidential election.

Observers noted that China has increasingly relied on coast guard vessels, maritime surveillance ships, and so-called “law enforcement patrols” rather than traditional naval deployments around Taiwan. One scholar cited economic pressure as a major reason for the shift, arguing that coast guard operations are far less costly than military deployments while still allowing Beijing to create the perception of “encirclement” around Taiwan.

Analysts also said the strategy enables Beijing to frame its activities as administrative law enforcement or maritime management rather than overt military escalation. China hopes the regular presence of coast guard vessels will gradually normalize Beijing’s claims over waters currently regarded as part of international freedom of navigation zones.

Source: Epoch Times, June 4, 2026
https://www.epochtimes.com/gb/26/6/3/n14781055.htm

China Removes Over 300,000 Law Enforcement Personnel Amid Fiscal Pressure

China’s Ministry of Justice recently announced that a nationwide rectification campaign had resulted in the removal or reassignment of more than 300,000 unqualified administrative law enforcement personnel within one year, while more than 7,000 non-compliant enforcement entities were shut down.

According to The Beijing News, Vice Minister of Justice Hu Weilie stated on May 21 that authorities had also eliminated more than 400,000 unnecessary enforcement items. He added that local governments had waived over 11 billion yuan in fines during the campaign. At the same time, Hu acknowledged that problems such as arbitrary enforcement, selective non-enforcement, disproportionate punishments, and “fines without supervision” continue to occur.

Despite official claims of progress in “standardizing law enforcement,” many observers remain skeptical. A commentator argued that the campaign serves two main purposes: reducing fiscal burdens by cutting large numbers of temporary or outsourced personnel, and shifting blame for public dissatisfaction onto lower-level enforcement staff rather than addressing deeper systemic problems within the central authorities.

Source: Epoch Times, May 25, 2026
https://www.epochtimes.com/gb/26/5/24/n14773451.htm

AI Analysis Suggests Xi Jinping’s “Sadness” Has Increased Dramatically Over the Past Decade

Japan’s Yomiuri Shimbun reported that Taiwanese Academia Sinica researcher Tsai Wen-hsuan has found Xi Jinping’s “sadness” increased significantly over the past ten years.

Tsai has long used artificial intelligence to analyze publicly available footage from Chinese state media programs such as China Central Television’s (CCTV’s) Xinwen Lianbo, focusing on Xi’s emotions, physical condition, and overall demeanor. According to Tsai’s AI-based analysis comparing Xi’s appearances at military parades in 2015 and 2025, indicators associated with “sadness” rose from 17.3 percent to 48.6 percent, while “disgust” increased from 5.8 percent to 13.6 percent.

Tsai linked these changes to political turmoil within the Chinese military leadership. Ahead of the September 2025 military parade, nine PLA generals — including former Central Military Commission (CMC) Vice Chairman He Weidong and former Political Work Department Director Miao Hua, both regarded as Xi allies — were expelled from the Communist Party and military and transferred for prosecution on the same day. Outside observers widely believed the move was orchestrated by CMC Vice Chairman Zhang Youxia. However, on January 24, 2026, Xi removed Zhang Youxia and CMC Joint Staff Department Chief Liu Zhenli, a move many analysts interpreted as Xi’s counterattack against Zhang.

Source: Epoch Times, May 29, 2026
https://www.epochtimes.com/gb/26/5/29/n14776689.htm

Singapore Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong Visits China, Reaffirms Independent National Identity

Singapore Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong visited China from May 18 to 22, 2026, with stops in Guangxi and Shanghai.

On May 22, Lee gave a joint interview to Singaporean media that attracted widespread attention. He emphasized that although Singapore is a majority ethnic Chinese society, it is a multiracial and sovereign nation independent from China. He stressed that Singapore’s relationship with China is grounded in mutual interests rather than ethnic or cultural ties.

“We cooperate as friends because we share common interests, not because of any supposed common ancestry,” Lee said.

Observers viewed the remarks as a clear reaffirmation of Singapore’s longstanding diplomatic position. Since independence under Lee Kuan Yew, Singapore has consistently rejected being viewed as a “third China,” while maintaining close ties with both China and Western countries.

Source: QQ, May 26, 2026
https://news.qq.com/rain/a/20260526A02MP500?suid=&media_id=

Impact on Xi Jinping If Russia Suffers Defeat in Ukraine

A Chinese article analyzes the potential impact on Beijing and Xi Jinping if Russia suffers defeat in the Ukraine war. It argues that such an outcome could significantly affect Xi’s governing environment, strategic legacy, and historical standing.

1. Pressure on Political Legitimacy and Narrative Framework

Russia’s weakening as a major strategic partner could undermine the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP’s) official narratives emphasizing “historical confidence” and “confidence in the system.” Any abrupt adjustment in China’s Russia policy could create cognitive dissonance within both the Party and broader society, particularly among nationalist groups. Xi’s highly centralized governance model is closely tied to perceptions of strategic foresight and correct decision-making. A major failure by a close partner could therefore be viewed as a foreign policy misjudgment, weakening Xi’s authority within elite political circles.

2. Systemic Pressure on China’s Diplomatic Strategy

A Russian defeat could reshape China’s external environment. Without Russia serving as a northern strategic buffer and absorbing part of U.S. and Western strategic attention, more American resources could shift toward the Indo-Pacific region, increasing pressure on issues such as Taiwan and the South China Sea. China’s broader “anti-hegemony” alignment could weaken, reducing the effectiveness of organizations such as BRICS and the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation.

China’s Eurasian strategy could also face setbacks. Projects linked to the Belt and Road Initiative, including Arctic shipping routes and cross-border infrastructure projects, could stall or require renegotiation. On the Taiwan issue, weaker Russian support could reduce certain external variables, but it could also increase the likelihood of stronger Western intervention, raising strategic uncertainty for Beijing.

3. Domestic Economic and Governance Risks

External shocks could quickly transmit into China’s domestic economy. Reduced access to discounted Russian energy supplies could increase import costs and amplify commodity price volatility. Combined with existing problems in real estate, local government debt, and industrial supply chains, these pressures could narrow the policy space for initiatives such as “dual circulation” and “common prosperity.”

Broader financial instability could trigger capital outflows and weaken market confidence. Within the Party, more pragmatic factions could use the situation to criticize policies perceived as prioritizing “security” over economic development.

4. Extreme Scenario: Political Challenges to Xi Jinping

In a more severe scenario, a Russian defeat could trigger a chain reaction involving deterioration in China–Russia relations, intensified economic pressure, growing factional struggles within the Party, and greater international isolation. Under such conditions, Xi’s political position could face systemic challenges, including the possibility of being forced down. Historically, the collapse or weakening of major strategic allies has often accelerated the erosion of authority for highly centralized authoritarian leaders, especially when domestic structural tensions remain unresolved.

Source: CReaders.Net, May 22, 2026
https://news.creaders.net/china/2026/05/22/3006530.html

China’s Military Purge Continues as Xi Jinping Issues New Rules for Senior Officers

Following one of the most sweeping purges of China’s military leadership in recent history, the Central Military Commission (CMC), chaired by Xi Jinping, has issued 26 new measures to tighten oversight and ideological control over senior officers.

State media reported Wednesday that the new regulations aim to enforce strict discipline through “iron rules” governing the education, management, and supervision of high-ranking military officials. The rules emphasize strengthening Communist Party collective leadership, improving political screening during officer selection, and deepening “ideological rectification” campaigns.

The announcement comes amid Xi’s second wave of military purges, which has effectively decimated China’s top brass. On May 7, former Defense Ministers Wei Fenghe and Li Shangfu were both sentenced to death with a two-year reprieve. Among the seven CMC members, only two remain active, while Zhang Youxia — once considered Xi’s closest confidant and the CMC’s First Vice Chairman — is currently under investigation.

The scale of the purge has raised serious questions internationally about the combat readiness of the People’s Liberation Army, particularly since nearly all of the fallen generals were personally vetted and promoted by Xi himself.

State media did not release the full text of the new measures, but CCTV reported they will set clear guidelines on Party oversight of senior officers, personnel selection, and political education. A recurring theme is ensuring strict adherence to the principle that “the Party commands the gun” — not the reverse.

The charges against Zhang Youxia are illustrative: a PLA Daily editorial accused him of five serious failures, nearly all centered on insufficient absolute loyalty and obedience to Xi. Analysts note that the continued purges and the new regulations both point to a fundamental and unresolved trust problem between Xi and his own military leadership.

Source: Radio France International, May 28, 2026
https://rfi.my/CjvS