Government/Politics - 183. page
Caixin: Who Is the “Big Tiger” That the CCDI Talked About?
On its own website on February 25, 2015, the CCP’s Central Commission for Discipline Inspection (CCDI) published an article titled, "Problems with the Lifestyle of the Qing Dynasty’s ‘Naked Official’ Prince Qing." The article stated that Prince Qing (庆亲王) was the culprit who, in the late Qing Dynasty, created an extensive corrupt environment. He took huge bribes, sold official positions for money, put all his money in foreign banks, and kept bribing the actual ruler Empress Dowager Cixi. The whole nation followed his example. CCDI didn’t say who, in its eyes, todays "Prince Qing" is.
The term "Naked Official" (裸官, sometimes written as "luo guan" based on its Chinese pronunciation) used in the article refers to officials who save their money overseas and may also have their family members migrate overseas, while only they themselves remain in China at their official post. The article stated that Prince Qing was a "naked official."
On March 24, 2015, Caixin, which is said to have a close relationship with Wang Qishan the head of the CCDI, published an article in English titled, "Who Is Prince Qing?" This article stated that Zeng Qinghong is most likely the "Prince Qing" that CCDI mentioned in its article. It stated, "Who is the Prince Qing of the current anti-corruption campaign? Speculation is rife that Zeng Qinghong, former vice president and close adviser to ex-president Jiang Zemin, fits the bill, especially because his name contains the same character for Qing."
It also stated that back then Cixi "relied more on blood lineage" to rule the country. "Today the princelings tout their ‘red gene’ to justify their entitlement to power, status and wealth. The parallel does not escape notice." Again, this indicates that Zeng Qinghong, who is a princeling, fits the bill well.
The interpretation of some media was that Empress Dowager Cixi stood for Jiang Zemin.
1. CCDI Website, February 25, 2015
http://www.ccdi.gov.cn/yw/201502/t20150215_51495.html
2. Caixin Online, March 24, 2015
http://english.caixin.com/2015-03-24/100794229.html
3. Eurasia Review, March 25, 2015
http://www.eurasiareview.com/25032015-china-xi-jinpings-anti-corruption-drive-to-net-more-tigers-analysis/
Xinhua: China to Establish One ID Card System to Document Each Citizen’s Daily Life Information
Recently, the General Office of the Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party and the General Office of the State Council of the People’s Republic of China issued 21 regulations designed to strengthen the social security protection system. According to the new policies, China will establish a nationwide “automated security monitoring system” using “new Internet & networking technology, extensive data, cloud computing, intelligent sensing, remote sensing, satellite positioning, and geographic information systems.”
China will establish “One ID Card System” which will require each citizen to use his real name in his daily life activities. Citizens’ ID numbers will be the only unique code that connects them to the national population basic information database. In that database, the government will document all of each citizen’s personal information and daily activities.
Source: Xinhua, April 13, 2015
http://news.xinhuanet.com/politics/2015-04/13/c_1114955339.htm
A Large Wave of Government Officials Seen Leaving the Public Sector
Hong Kong Media: Iron Hat Kings Coup Portends the Inevitable Decisive Battle between Xi and Jiang
On April 6, 2015, Hong Kong Oriental Daily Online published a commentary analyzing the current political situation in China using the historical analogy of the Qing Dynasty’s "Eight King Government" coup against Emperor Yongzheng. At that time corrupt officials had severely weakened the country. Yongzheng tried to push through new policies to rebuild the country’s wealth and to consolidate power. He then faced severe resistance from the officials. The "Iron Hat Kings" [1] even attempted a coup to nullify Yongzheng’s power. Eventually Yongzheng won the fight.
http://hk.on.cc/cn/bkn/cnt/commentary/20150407/bkncn-20150407000317701-0407_05411_001.html
Hu Shuli Criticized Ma Jian for Intervention in Judiciary; Implications for Jiang Zemin?
On April 6, 2015, Caixin Weekly published an article that Hu Shuli, the editor-in-chief of Caixin, wrote. The title was, "The Promise to Resist Officials’ intervention in the Judiciary." The article discussed the new policy that the Office of the Chinese Communist Party Central Commission and the Office of the State of the People’s Republic of China issued and published on Xinhua on March 30, 2015. [1] The policy established a penalty, thereby preventing government officials from intervening in judicial activities and meddling with the judicial records of specific cases.
Hu pointed out in her article that Ma Jian, the former Deputy Minister of State Security, who used to support Guo Wengui (as discussed in previous ChinaScope briefings [2] [3]), has repeatedly intervened in criminal cases. Ma Jian was responsible to Zeng Qinghong, who was former leader Jiang Zemin’s top advisor. Hu Shuli stated, "Obviously, Ma’s purpose was to shelter their money-power trade network. However, a corrupt official whose rank and power was higher than Ma’s would have intervened more recklessly in the judicial system, and might even have done so in the name of strengthening the Party’s leadership over judicial work. Such acts have seriously damaged the judiciary, shaken citizens’ belief in the rule of law, and become the most dangerous viruses infecting China’s judicial system." [4]
The above-mentioned "higher-rank official" who "intervened more recklessly in the judicial system" "in the name of strengthening the Party’s leadership over judicial work" is likely to refer to Jiang Zemin, because he used that term, but his successors Hu Jintao and Xi Jinping did not.
Sources:
[1] Xinhua, March 30, 2015
http://news.xinhuanet.com/legal/2015-03/30/c_1114812232.htm
[2] ChinaScope, "Big Fight May Be Going on between Zeng Qinghong and Wang Qishan"
http://chinascope.org/main/content/view/7047/40/
[3] ChinaScope, "Caixin Sues Guo Wengui and Hong Kong Media for Defamation"
http://chinascope.org/main/content/view/7046/40/
[4] Caixin Weekly, April 6, 2015
http://weekly.caixin.com/2015-04-03/100797262.html
Ministry of Education Named Seven Most Corrupt Areas in Colleges and Universities
China Review News published an article on the recently held 2015 Ministry of Education video conference on the “development of the Party’s conduct and of an honest and clean government.” The anti-corruption effort in colleges and universities will be its key focus in 2015. Among the seven areas that have the most serious corruption, the article named building construction and purchasing as the top two. In addition, corruption has also been reported in such areas as admission, accounting, research funding, school-managed enterprises, and academic dishonesty.
The article named a few college officials who had recently been taken down from their posts. They include the party secretary of Jining Medical University, the Principal of Nanchang University, the Party secretary from Ling Jing University and several others. It also mentioned that Renmin University was reported as having committed 49 counts of violations including in the area of student admissions. The result was that 47 people will be going through legal proceedings, 114 have received the Party’s disciplinary fine, and 14 received verbal warnings.
Source: China Review News, April 5, 2015
http://hk.crntt.com/doc/1036/9/7/1/103697173.html?coluid=241&kindid=13578&docid=103697173&mdate=0405094523
Outlook Weekly: Four Groups That Resist Reform
Outlook Weekly published a commentary stating that Xi Jinping views four groups as being resistant to reform.