Hong Kong Economic Times (HKET), the leading financial daily in Hong Kong, recently reported that China’s foreign direct investment (FDI) in Europe last year was only 6.8 billion euros, 300 million euros less than the previous year and the lowest figure seen since 2010.

The peak of China’s FDI in Europe (the 27 EU countries and UK) was 47.5 billion euros in 2016. Direct investments have been on the decline since then. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, Chinese FDI numbers reached 14.2 billion euros, and last year’s 6.8 billion euros in FDI were only about 14 percent of the peak value from 2016.

In the past, Chinese foreign direct investment was concentrated in the UK, France and Germany, referred to in China as “the Big Three.” In the past two years, however, Hungary has adopted a pro-China stance while Chinese direct investment in Hungary has substantially increased. Hungary became the largest destination of Chinese FDI funds last year, accounting for 44.1 percent of Chinese foreign direct investment.

Electric vehicles and their supply chains have become the most important Chinese foreign direct investments, accounting for 41 percent of China’s total FDI in Europe in 2022 and rising to 69 percent in 2023.

The decline in China’s direct investment in Europe will be partially counteracted by electric vehicle-related investment, though any near-term rebound in FDI may be insignificant. Affected by factors such as the weakening finances of Chinese companies, increased controls on Chinese investments by European countries, and tensions in China-EU trade relations, Chinese foreign direct investment in Europe is expected to continue to be sluggish.

Source: HKET, June 6, 2024
https://tinyurl.com/2s37eers

Well-known Chinese news site NetEase (NASDAQ: NTES) recently reported on a recent statement by Alibaba that the company now refuses to accept payments in Russian rubles. The company said it would no longer supply goods to Russia.

NetEase referred to a report published by Russian business newspaper Kommersant for this latest move by Alibaba, the owner of the online shopping portal AliExpress. Russian economists linked the decision to fears of secondary U.S. sanctions. Alibaba is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and uses the U.S. dollar settlement system. The company does not want to lose access to the European and American markets because of its involvement with Russia.

In a similar case not long ago, Chinese security monitoring giant Hikvision withdrew from the Russian market without warning. It did not provide any form of communication or explanation to customers and partners. It not only closed all offices and factories in Russia, but also closed all Russian official websites and exited Russian social networks. Phone calls to the company’s Russian phone numbers went unanswered as well. The news was widely reported in China. As of June 8, however, nearly all of the references to this story were removed from China’s domestic internet.

Sources:
(1) NetEase, May 30, 2024
https://www.163.com/dy/article/J3FLM0JS05566UP9.html

(2) Weibo, June 5, 2024 (Link still alive as of June 8, 2024)
https://weibo.com/ttarticle/p/show?id=2309405042201812926578

The Georgian government announced that a Chinese consortium will build a strategic port on Georgia’s Black Sea coast, a move that could strain Georgia’s relations with the West. The decision comes just after Georgia’s parliament attempted to pass a controversial “foreign agents” law.

The Chinese consortium that will build the port includes Chinese state-owned enterprises with a history of international controversies, ranging from fraud allegations in the Philippines to bribery in Bangladesh. Two of the companies in the consortium have even been banned from participating in World Bank-funded construction projects. This choice by the Georgian government could further escalate tensions between Georgia and the West.

The port project in Anaklia, a small Black Sea resort town, is seen as a critical part of the “Middle Corridor,” a global trade network between Europe and Asia. Critics worry that giving China control over this key port would allow them to dominate a crucial trade route.

The main company in the Chinese port-building consortium is the China Communications Construction Company (CCCC), a key player in China’s Belt and Road Initiative. Despite its global presence, CCCC faces scrutiny for its overseas practices. These include fraud scandals in the Philippines and contract termination controversies in Tanzania.

The Georgian port deal marks the country’s second attempt to build a deep-sea port in Anaklia; a previous attempt led by Georgia’s TBC Bank and the U.S. firm Conti International was canceled in 2020 amid political controversies.

Some see the timing of the Georgian government’s decision regarding port construction as a message about Georgia’s geopolitical leanings. The move comes at a time when Georgia’s relationship with the West is already strained due to the Georgian “foreign agents” law. According to Wikipedia, the foreign agents law “would require non-governmental organizations (NGOs) to register as foreign agents or ‘organizations carrying the interests of a foreign power’ and disclose the sources of their income if the funds they receive from abroad amount to more than 20% of their total revenue.”

Sources:

Voice of America, June 4, 2024
https://www.voachinese.com/a/china-georgia-controversial-blacksea-project/7641737.html

Wikipedia, Retrieved Jun 6, 2024
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2023%E2%80%932024_Georgian_protests