Skip to content

US-China Relations - 2. page

Report Urges Congressional Investigation into Environmental Law Institute over Alleged CCP Links

U.S. national security organization State Armor has submitted a report to Congress urging an investigation into the Environmental Law Institute (ELI), alleging that the organization has longstanding ties to entities affiliated with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). According to the report, ELI has collaborated for decades with organizations connected to the CCP, China’s intelligence apparatus, and its military research network, potentially advancing Beijing’s geopolitical and energy interests.

The report focuses on ELI’s Climate Judiciary Project (CJP), which, according to ELI, has provided climate and environmental law training to more than 2,000 U.S. judges since 2018. The program presents advocacy-oriented materials rather than politically neutral educational content, encouraging legal action against energy companies and promoting litigation as a means of regulating the energy sector. Some training materials were developed or funded by individuals with political or financial interests in climate-related litigation, without those relationships being disclosed to participating judges.

State Armor argues that ELI has influenced U.S. climate policy in ways that weaken domestic energy production while advancing China’s strategic interests. It contends that ELI has promoted regulatory frameworks imposing stricter constraints on U.S. energy producers without advocating comparable standards for China. According to the report, this asymmetry has the effect—whether intentional or not—of undermining U.S. energy security and industrial competitiveness while increasing reliance on supply chains in which China plays a dominant role.

Source: Epoch Times, July 4, 2026
https://www.epochtimes.com/gb/26/7/3/n14802346.htm

Briefings | | |   @CS Economy/Resources US-China Relations

U.S. Agencies Urge States and Businesses to Resist PRC Pressure on Taiwan Engagement

The U.S. Departments of State, Agriculture, and Commerce jointly sent letters dated June 16 to U.S. governors and business leaders, urging them to resist pressure from the People’s Republic of China (PRC) intended to discourage engagement with Taiwan. The letters were publicly released by the American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) on June 24.

According to the letters, PRC embassies and consulates in the United States frequently engage with state and local governments, as well as private companies, in an effort to discourage exchanges with Taiwan. The agencies warned that Chinese officials often misrepresent U.S. policy by falsely claiming that Washington has endorsed Beijing’s position on Taiwan. State officials and business leaders facing such pressure are encouraged to contact the State Department for assistance.

The letters reaffirm the strategic importance of the U.S.–Taiwan partnership, describing Taiwan as the United States’ fourth-largest trading partner, a global leader in advanced manufacturing and the digital economy, and a longstanding partner in trade, investment, and people-to-people exchanges. The letter to governors underscores the unique role of state and local governments in expanding cooperation with Taiwan, particularly in disaster preparedness and critical infrastructure resilience. The letter to business leaders highlights growing commercial opportunities and encourages companies to utilize U.S. government resources to obtain accurate information.

Source: Epoch Times, June 25, 2026
https://www.epochtimes.com/gb/26/6/25/n14796111.htm

Briefings | | |   @CS US-China Relations

Xinhua: U.S.–Iran Ceasefire Memorandum Reflects Trump Administration’s Strategic Constraints

Xinhua News Agency published an article commenting on the ceasefire memorandum reached between the United States and Iran, calling it a “reluctant choice by the Trump administration as it finds itself mired in a strategic and military quagmire.”

The article said that analysts view the agreement as a pragmatic arrangement driven by mutual security concerns, economic interests, and domestic political pressures rather than a lasting reconciliation. Consequently, significant uncertainty remains regarding both the implementation of the agreement and the future trajectory of regional stability.

A key obstacle is the deep lack of trust between Washington and Tehran. Iranian officials remain highly skeptical of U.S. intentions, citing previous instances in which the U.S. conducted major military operations against Iran during periods of diplomatic engagement. Without clearly defined implementation procedures and verification mechanisms, both sides may selectively interpret or enforce the agreement, increasing the likelihood of mutual accusations of noncompliance.

Israel is widely seen as another major complicating factor. Israeli leaders continue to view Iran and its regional partners as existential threats, and some government officials have stated that any U.S.–Iran agreement would not constrain Israeli security operations. Domestic political considerations—including maintaining support from right-wing coalition partners and addressing voters’ security concerns—could encourage continued military pressure on Iranian-backed groups, potentially undermining the ceasefire.

Analysts also note that the memorandum does not address the fundamental disputes between the two countries, particularly over Iran’s nuclear program. While Washington seeks an exit from a costly regional confrontation and Tehran hopes to ease economic and political pressure, the current arrangement is widely viewed as a preliminary step toward more substantive negotiations. Reaching a comprehensive agreement within the next 60 days is expected to be extremely challenging.

Some observers argue that the memorandum reflects the Trump administration’s limited strategic options rather than a major diplomatic breakthrough. Its principal achievement is the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, a critical maritime trade route disrupted by the recent conflict. Even if a future nuclear agreement is reached, it may offer no greater benefits than the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), from which President Trump withdrew in 2018. After years of confrontation, the two sides may ultimately find themselves not far from where they began.

Source: Xinhua, June 15, 2026
https://www.news.cn/world/20260615/9b2a5760d8134cb5b8df681732e1e005/c.html

Briefings | | |   @CS Defense/Military Geo-Strategic Trend US-China Relations

China-U.S. Local Cooperation Dialogue Held in Zhengzhou

According to Chinese state media, the 2026 China-U.S. Local Cooperation Dialogue was held in Zhengzhou, Henan Province on June 16, co-hosted by the Chinese People’s Association for Friendship with Foreign Countries and the Henan Provincial Government.

The event drew more than 200 participants, including representatives from over 20 U.S. states such as Illinois, Iowa, and Minnesota; industry associations including the Heartland China Association, the U.S.-China Business Council, the American Soybean Association, the U.S. Soybean Export Council, the USA Rice Federation, and the U.S. Grains and Bioproducts Association; major American companies such as Cargill, Corteva, and Walmart; 15 U.S. academic institutions and research organizations including Harvard and Yale; and delegations from five Chinese provinces — Henan, Liaoning, Anhui, Hunan, and Shaanxi.

Themed “Cultivating Cooperation for Mutual Benefit, Sharing Peace and Prosperity,” the dialogue featured in-depth exchanges on China-U.S. cooperation in agriculture, food, and health. Participants also took part in product showcases, site visits, and business matchmaking sessions, resulting in the signing of multiple cooperation agreements. The event was described as a successful example of integrated industry-commerce-academic-research collaboration between local stakeholders from both countries.

All parties in attendance expressed their commitment to actively implementing the consensus reached between the two heads of state, deepening practical cooperation, and contributing to the development of a constructive and strategically stable China-U.S. relationship.

Source: Sputnik News, June 16, 2026
https://sputniknews.cn/20260616/1071872186.html

Briefings | | |   US-China Relations

KMT Chair Cheng Li-wun Unable to Meet U.S. National Security Council Officials During Washington Visit

During Kuomintang (KMT) Chair Cheng Li-wun’s visit to Washington, D.C., local media reported that a planned meeting with U.S. National Security Council (NSC) officials was first downgraded and later canceled without a public explanation. According to the reports, Cheng’s delegation had initially been expected to meet NSC officials at the White House on June 10. The meeting was later moved to the American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) headquarters in Washington and downgraded to a lower-level NSC representative before being canceled altogether.

Washington observers suggested the cancellations may have been linked to Cheng’s recent remarks criticizing U.S.-Taiwan arms sales and describing First Island Chain security cooperation as a “Cold War mentality.” Some analysts argued that such comments raised concerns among U.S. officials because they echoed narratives frequently promoted by Beijing. The KMT has also questioned the proposed NT$1.25 trillion (US$40 billion) special defense budget and raised allegations of corruptions in U.S. proposed arms sales.

The reported cancellations drew attention because, under past practice, visiting Taiwanese political leaders have often met with senior NSC officials and AIT representatives during trips to Washington.

Source: Liberty Times (Taiwan), June 11, 2026
https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/politics/breakingnews/5468674

Briefings | | |   @CS US-China Relations

The Eighth China–U.S. Sister Cities Conference Held in San Francisco

The Eighth China–U.S. Sister Cities Conference was held in San Francisco on June 5 under the theme “Working Together to Promote High-Quality Development of China–U.S. Cities.”

People’s Daily described the event as an important bilateral dialogue following the recent meeting between Trump and Xi Jinping in Beijing. The conference brought together more than 150 representatives from 15 Chinese provincial-level regions and 12 cities, as well as 160 representatives from 21 U.S. states and 36 cities.

Participants exchanged views on green development and urban governance, culture and tourism, and education and youth engagement. During the conference, Chinese and U.S. cities signed five cooperation agreements and showcased 31 collaborative projects covering sister-city partnerships, cultural and tourism exchanges, and youth programs.

Analysts have been pointed out that the Chinese Communist Party’s United Front Work Department has used subnational exchange programs, including sister-city and sister-province relationships, to expand political influence and cultivate local networks within the United States.

Source: People’s Daily, June 8, 2026
https://paper.people.com.cn/rmrb/pc/content/202606/08/content_30161744.html

Briefings | | |   Government/Politics US-China Relations

Analysis: Confucius Institutes Continue Influencing U.S. Schools Under New Identities

The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) launched Confucius Institutes in 2004, partnering with American universities and K-12 schools to promote Chinese language and cultural programs in the United States. In recent years, the institutes faced widespread criticism and closures over concerns about propaganda and foreign influence. However, analysts argue that some of these networks have reemerged under new organizational identities to continue promoting CCP influence in U.S. education.

Jennifer Richmond of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies wrote in The Hill that many former Confucius Institute networks have survived by rebranding themselves as nonprofit cultural and educational exchange organizations. Citing a 2022 report by the National Association of Scholars, she argued that some programs continue operating through renamed entities while maintaining ties with Chinese government institutions.

One example is the Virginia-based nonprofit Center for Bridging Cultures, which reportedly places Chinese teachers in U.S. classrooms, organizes China exchange trips, and partners with schools and universities. Public records show links between the organization and the former Confucius Institute network. Gao Qing, its executive director previously led the Confucius Institute U.S. Center, which the U.S. State Department designated in 2020 as a Chinese foreign mission linked to Beijing’s overseas influence operations.

The article argued that current U.S. transparency laws leave significant loopholes because schools are not required to fully disclose relationships with nonprofit organizations operating on behalf of foreign entities. Richmond called for stronger oversight of nonprofit groups linked to CCP influence networks.

Source: Epoch Times, June 2, 2026
https://www.epochtimes.com/gb/26/6/1/n14779990.htm

Briefings | | |   @CS US-China Relations

China Promotes “Constructive Strategic Stability” as New Framework for U.S.–China Relations

On May 14, Xi Jinping met with visiting U.S. President Trump and stated that both sides agreed to establish a “constructive strategic stability relationship” as a new framework for U.S.–China relations. Xi said the concept would provide strategic guidance for bilateral ties over the next three years and beyond, and expressed confidence that it would be welcomed by both countries and the international community.

People’s Daily described the agreement as the most significant political consensus reached during the meeting, emphasizing its importance amid a complex and evolving international environment. It characterized the concept as a key step in redefining bilateral relations.

At a regular press briefing on May 18, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun said China is willing to work with the United States to “continuously substantiate the connotation of this framework.” He stated that China aims to fully implement the consensus reached by the two leaders, strengthen dialogue, expand cooperation, properly manage differences and sensitive issues, and promote stable, healthy, and sustainable development of bilateral relations.

Sources:
1. People’s Daily, May 18, 2026
https://world.people.com.cn/n1/2026/0518/c1002-40721842.html
2. Xinhua, May 18, 2026
https://www.xinhuanet.com/20260518/b19e769dbcd34a0c806d81c7c6262048/c.html

Briefings | | |   US-China Relations