Skip to content

All posts by NNL - 152. page

Netizens Comments on Global Times’ Attack on Gao Zhisheng’s Book

Gao Zhisheng recently published a book describing his experience of being tortured while in the custody of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). He also predicted that the CCP will end in 2017.

On June 16, Global Times published a commentary in which it criticized Gao and “certain overseas [hostile] forces.” The commentary said, “Gao’s book is nothing. We mentioned it as an example in this article to tell the public that certain overseas forces have even praised such a garbage book. This shows how badly they want to see China collapse. … They are using booing and cursing, instead of criticism and debate [to attack China].”

“These dissidents truly wish China to get into trouble. They view China’s getting into political turmoil as an opportunity for them to gain political power. They are very willing to sacrifice the Chinese people’s interests …”

“The overseas hostile forces use the extremists in China to conduct damaging activities. This approach was already known to Chinese society and they discarded it. For those people and those forces, there is a pole of shame in China’s history waiting for them.”

Then netizens commented on the Global Time‘s article:

“It seems that this book is worth reading. It poked at the sore spot of a certain organization.”

“Your husband beats you every day. You report him to the police. Is that counted as ‘collaborating with outside forces’?”

“The party that rules China does not equal China. [Gao’s book talked about the collapse of the CCP, not China.]”

“China will never collapse, but it is hard to say that about the CCP.”

“Thank you Global Times for letting me know about this book. I will search for the electronic version of it.”

Source: China Digital Times, June 2016

【异文观止】单仁平:诅咒中国可耻,倚仗境外势力可悲

Epoch Times: Interview with a Princeling

On June 13, 2016, the U.S. Congress passed House Resolution 343 unanimously, condemning China’s "practice of state-sanctioned forced organ harvesting" and demanded "an immediate end to the 17-year persecution of the Falun Gong spiritual practice."

Epoch Times interviewed Luo Yu, the son of former Grant General (a military title only lower than Marshall) Luo Ruiqing, on the impact of the resolution. Luo Yu has published ten open letters to Xi Jinping, whom he called "brother" due to their princeling connections, urging him to adopt political reform and stop political persecutions.

Luo Yu said, "This U.S. house resolution will impact all Chinese. No Chinese, I believe, besides those criminals like Zhou Yongkang [who participated in the organ harvesting], would agree to the anti-humanity crime – conducting live organ harvesting of Falun Gong practitioners and criminals of conscience. Nobody would agree. Now the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has tried to block this information, but I don’t think it can block it. The Internet has been well developed. The more people know about this practice, the more people will oppose it.

"The U.S. represents the people’s opinions, ideas about democracy, and justice. It has a profound and long-term impact on China. Because there are always people speaking out in the world, there are always voices of the upright condemning these crimes. This is the meaning of the U.S. house resolution."

As to the Spokesperson, Zhu Haiquan of China’s Embassy to the U.S. claimed that all these [organ harvesting] accusations were groundless, Luo Yu observed, "When the U.S. Congress passes a resolution, it won’t, as China’s Foreign Affairs Ministry said, only listen to lies. If it did not have evidence, it would not pass such a resolution. The U.S. Congress’s resolution makes the intellectuals of China understand that the whole world is watching it and moreover, that it is true.

Luo Yu called on Xi Jinping to stop the organ harvesting. "You are the General Secretary of the CCP. How can you let this heinous crime continue to happen in China? This did not start with Xi Jinping. It is actually [the former CCP leader] Jiang Zemin’s crime." "Now Xi Jinping promotes the rule by law. If you can’t stop live organ harvesting which obviously violates the law, how can you rule by law?"

Source: Epoch Times, June 21, 2016
http://www.epochtimes.com/gb/16/6/20/n8018289.htm
 

Why Do More and More Chinese Get Cancer?

Vista Story Magazine published an article discussing the increase in the rate of cancer in China. According to the 2015 Cancer Registration Annual Report that the National Cancer Registration Center published, by 2011, China had 3.37 million cancer cases. That meant that, on average, a person would get cancer every six minutes. By 2015, the number of China’s cancer cases reached 4.29 million. Of these, lung cancer claimed the highest number at 733,300 cases.

Only less than 20 percent of cancers were due to heritage (occurred within families that had a history of cancer). Over 80 percent were due to lifestyle. In China, the causes for cancer included virus infection, smoking, insufficient fruit intake, drinking, insufficient vegetable intake, and work-related reasons. For example, smoking caused 30 percent of cancer cases and over 70 percent of lung cancer cases were related to smoking.

Some smaller samples showed that the polluted environment contributed to increasing cancer rates. However, due to lack of data, researchers cannot yet draw a decisive conclusion on a large scale about the environmental causes.

Source: Sohu.com, June 12, 2016
http://health.sohu.com/20160612/n454060450.shtml

Asia Pacific Daily: China Arrested a North Korean Spy

Asia Pacific Daily published a comprehensive article based on reports from several media that China arrested a North Korean spy at home in early June and confiscated 30 million yuan (US$4.6 million) and some gold bars.

The Yomiuri Shimbun, a Japanese media, which received information on June 11, first reported the news.

The South Korean media Chosun Ilbo reported, "The huge amount of cash and gold bars belonged to the North Korean military or the Worker’s Party."

The arrested spy was stationed in Dandong City, a city on China’s border with North Korea. He was referred to as "representative of the home country" and "General Manager." He was believed to have participated in the secret trade of materials that the United Nations embargoed against North Korean.

This arrest took place a few days after Vice chairman of the Workers’ Party Lee Yong-soo’s visit to China. Lee had a meeting with Xi Jinping in Beijing and returned on June 2. The Yomiuri Shimbun believed that China arrested the spy in order to apply pressure to North Korea because Lee Yong-soo expressed, during his meeting, that North Korea would continue its nuclear development efforts.

South Korea’s media JoongAng Ilbo also reported that, in March, a North Korean official tried to carry 20,000 yuan (US$3,000) to North Korea but was stopped at China’s customs at Dandong. He ended up not going to North Korea. Some analysts suggested, "Since China does not allow wiring Renminbi from banks to North Korea , the North Koreans can only transport cash. If China strengthens currency control [at the border], North Korea may have [no choice but] to smuggle or use international postal delivery vehicles to send cash."

The United Nations Resolution 2270, which was passed on March 2, required all member countries to cut bank connections with North Korea within 90 days.

Source: Asia Pacific Daily, June 14, 2016
http://zh.apdnews.com/asia/neasia/423565.html

China Youth Online: Military Staff Cut Has Started

China Youth reported that, as part of the military staff cut that Xi Jinping announced last year, China has started the first round of the retirement of officers of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA).

"The 21st Army of the Western Combat Theater, an air-defense unit of the Central Combat Theater, and an armored brigade of the Eastern Combat Theater all have recently held retirement ceremonies for the officers who are leaving the military."

One goal of Xi Jinping’s military reform was to shrink the PLA command structure. "Among the 300,000 military staff cut, half of them are officers."

Source: China Youth Daily, June 13, 2016
http://zqb.cyol.com/html/2016-06/13/nw.D110000zgqnb_20160613_2-12.htm

Lancome Bent Under Beijing’s Pressure

Lancome planned to have a free concert on June 19 featuring Hong Kong singer Denise Ho. However, under mounting pressure from China’s state media and "patriotic" netizens, Lancome backed out of the deal. This event and Lancome have received substantial international criticism.

In 1914, Denise Ho had been arrested for participating in the Occupy Central protest in Hong Kong. In addition, last month she met with Dalai Lama.

On June 4, Global Times published a posting with a question for netizens: "Some netizens reported that the hot selling Listerine and Lancome both invited Denise Ho to promote their products. Denise Ho supported Hong Kong independence and also, in Japan last week, advocated Tibetan independence. … What do you think?"

In no time netizens responded with the answer, "From now on absolutely boycott Lancome products."

Over a hundred Chinese netizens posted messages on Lancome’s official website in China, demanding that Lancome get out of China. Lancome China clarified that Denise Ho was not its product endorser. Over 40,000 Chinese netizens responded with their criticizm that Lancome was "playing a word game."

Lancome Hong Kong issued a statement on June 5 that its invitation to Denise Ho was "purely to share music, without any work endorsement relationship."

Late that night, Lancome issued an announcement saying, "We decided to cancel the event due to possible safety concerns."

Lancome’s kowtowing to Beijing irritated Hongkongese. By June 6, over 44,000 people clicked the "angry" button on Lancome’s two Facebook’s announcements.

Among the Internet messages, some Hong Kong netizens stated that they would not buy Lancome products anymore, some called for boycotting all products by L’Oreal, Lancome’s parent company, and some asked Lancome to fire its employees and public relations contractors who worked on the two announcements. [Editor’s Note: On Wednesday, June 8, Lancome shut its main stores in Hong Kong.]

Source: BBC Chinese, June 6, 2016
http://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/simp/china/2016/06/160606_hongkong_lancome_denise_ho

Comments after China’s Foreign Minister Vented His Anger at a Canadian Journalist

Wang Yi, China’s Foreign Minister, castigated a Canadian reporter at the joint news conference with Canadian Foreign Minister Stephane Dion in Ottawa on June 1. Western media and some overseas Chinese media reported on the incident.

The comments that the Chinese made were split. Some criticized the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) for suppressing human rights; some, following the Party’s propaganda, denounced the Westerners; and some pointed out Wang’s response was a result of the Party’s culture which has ruined Chinese’ lives.

Reader’s comments on a BBC report:

A post from California:
"It definitely does not sound like what a foreign minister would say. … What he said was unreasonable and illogical. What is the connection between China’s getting people out of poverty or reaching $8,000 per capita GDP and China’s human rights record? He said ‘China has incorporated protecting human rights into its Constitution.’ This only shows that the CCP’s Constitution was only for show. In their Constitution, people have freedom of the press, assembly, and protest [but in reality they don’t have any of those at all]!"

A post from London:
"Some Western media are too prejudiced. Only we Chinese know how good China’s human rights record is. Only we Chinese have the qualifications to choose what is good for our nation at its current status. Westerners, go worry about your own human rights first! Don’t put your nose into our business. Xi Jinping said it right: China should have confidence in its own system. Besides, it is OK as long as we think it is right. As to how Westerners think about it, it does not matter, nor is it worth answering. Just take [their words] as farting."

A post from Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China:
"Wang Yi’s response is a complete revelation of the CCP’s evil face. He said ‘it’s the Chinese people who most understand China’s human rights record.’ That’s right. As a Chinese, I have to say, ‘China’s human rights record is not only bad, but rather non-existent."

Epoch Times commentary:
"It is not news to see this kind of response by China’s diplomats. The most representative one was what former Communist leader Jiang Zemin said. When asked about a female college student whose participation in the June 4th democracy protest in 1989 resulted in being put in prison and raped, he answered, ‘She deserved it.’ Jiang also berated a Hong Kong reporter for being ‘too simple’ and ‘naive.’"

"Actually, the root cause for these foreign affairs scandals is the Communist Party culture."

"The Communist Party culture was a monster that the CCP created in China after destroying traditional Chinese culture. The CCP mingled the theory of evolution, atheism, Marxism and Leninism, and struggle theory together to create the Party culture. It then, via political movements and routine brainwashing, gradually implanted it into the brains of Chinese."

"Officials at all levels, despite their own personality, when in public, self-restrict themselves to speak the ‘Party language’ following the Party’s principles."

"Chinese, who have grown up under the CCP controlled environment, carry the imprints of the Party culture to a certain extent. The Party culture gave Chinese a twisted personality, such as the tendency to belittle and not respect their own selves, violence, offensiveness, rudeness, and pretense.

"After people accepted the Party language, it was hard for them to express themselves to and understand people outside of the Party culture. A typical example is the different interpretation of ‘human rights’ between Chinese and Westerners. When Westerners talk about human rights, they care for individual’s rights not being violated by the government. They are actually on the side of the Chinese people. If the Chinese people were normal people, they would express their gratitude. However, after bring immersed in the CCP’s brainwashing for such a long time, many Chinese have reacted to this issue the same as China’s Foreign Minister just did."

"The result of this is not only damaging China’s image, but also blocking Chinese from accepting outside messages with an open, calm mentality. It makes the whole Chinese nation incompatible with normal human civilization."

Below is Wang Yi’s response when he jumped in to answer a question which was asked to the Canadian Foreign Minister Dion about Canadian citizen Kevin Garratt who China had detained and about China’s human rights record.

Wang Yi: "I want to give a response to the questions that the journalist just raised concerning China. Your question was full of prejudice against China and an arrogance that comes from I don’t know where. This is totally unacceptable to me. Do you understand China? Have you been to China? Do you know that China has come from a poor and backward state and lifted more than 600 million people from poverty? Do you know that China is now the world’s second biggest economy with $8,000 per capita? If we weren’t able to protect human rights properly, would China have achieved such great development? Do you know that China has incorporated protecting human rights into its Constitution? I want to tell you that it’s the Chinese people who best understand China’s human rights record — not you, but the Chinese people themselves. You have no right to speak on this. The Chinese people have the right to speak. So please don’t raise such irresponsible questions again. China welcomes all well-meaning suggestions, but we reject all groundless accusations."

Sources:
1. BBC Chinese, June 2, 2016
http://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/simp/indepth/2016/06/160602_indepth_china_humanrights
2. Epoch Times, June 6, 2016
http://www.epochtimes.com/gb/16/6/6/n7970148.htm

QQ Finance: The Biggest Secret in China’s Real Estate

Tencent (QQ) Finance published an article revealing the "Biggest Secret in China’s Real Estate." It is that the companies that have recently set records for the price of land purchases are actually State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs). They are doing it just to create the illusion that the real estate market is doing well. The following is from the article.

For example, two companies, China Electric Power Construction Group and Guangzhou Fangrong Real Estate  Corporation bid 8.29 billion yuan (U.S. $1.3 billion) to win "A816-0060," a commercial and residential land development project in Longhua district, Shenzhen. The first company is clearly an SOE. After tracing the parent company of Guangzhou Fangrong several levels up, the owner of the second company was found to be China Sinochem, which is also an SOE.

The average purchase price per construction area was 56,781 yuan (U.S. $8,735) per square meter. Excluding general facilities that can’t be sold, it would be over 60,000 yuan per square meter for the sellable construction area. The land is not downtown; it is 12 km (8 miles) away from downtown. Residential buildings in this area currently sell at 50,000 – 75,000 yuan per square meter. It is hard to believe that the developers would be able to make a profit if they bid so high on the price of land.

Then, why would SOEs pay a record high amount to buy land?

The answer is simple. They are just collaborating with the local government to create the illusion that real estate prices will keep going up; they do it to cheat people.

China Times reported this practice back in 2014. "When the market is slow, the local government will ask SOEs to bid a high price for land purchases to create an artificially high market. To the government, the left hand pays the money to the right hand. There is no real gain or loss."

Another trick the government uses is to get a high bidding price but return a substantial amount of money back to the developer later. "Some companies may receive a return of nearly 50 percent of the purchase price. If the land was related to re-developing shantytown, the return might be 80 percent."

Source: Tencent, June 5, 2016
http://finance.qq.com/a/20160605/014662.htm