Skip to content

Defense/Military

Philippines Protests Chinese Floating Structure Near Scarborough Shoal

Satellite imagery obtained by Reuters and published on June 5 showed the presence of a floating structure near the entrance to the lagoon at Scarborough Shoal in the South China Sea. The shoal, an important fishing ground located about 200 kilometers west of the Philippines and approximately 874 kilometers from China’s Hainan Island, is claimed by both countries. China has maintained a regular presence of coast guard and maritime militia vessels in the area since gaining effective control of the shoal in 2012.

On June 8, Philippine Armed Forces Chief of Staff General Romeo Brawner Jr. revealed that a mobile floating structure measuring approximately six by six meters had been detected inside the lagoon. According to Brawner, the structure appeared to be equipped with antennas and was occupied by six individuals. The Philippine military deployed aircraft to monitor the site and announced plans to continue aerial and maritime surveillance to determine the structure’s purpose.

The Philippine government responded by filing a diplomatic protest through the Department of Foreign Affairs and consulting with allied and partner countries. Philippine officials expressed concern that any activity leading to the construction of permanent facilities at Scarborough Shoal could mirror developments at other disputed features that China later transformed into artificial islands.

On June 9, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian defended the activity, stating that Scarborough Shoal is “China’s inherent territory” and that China has “indisputable sovereignty” over the shoal and its surrounding waters. He said that activities conducted by China in the area, including scientific research, were legitimate exercises of sovereign rights and urged the Philippines to cease “maritime provocations and political hype.”

Source: Radio France International, June 9, 2026
https://www.rfi.fr/cn/国际/20260609-菲武装部队总参谋长证实黄岩岛发现载人漂浮结构-菲外交部向北京采取外交行动

Briefings | | |   Defense/Military Geo-Strategic Trend

PLA Expands Use of Civilian Resources for Logistics Support

People’s Daily reported that the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) is accelerating the integration of civilian resources into its logistics system, shifting away from a traditionally self-sufficient support model toward one that relies more heavily on government coordination, private-sector participation, and market-based services.

Under the reform effort, a growing range of civilian entities now support military logistics. Local supply chains are being used to deliver fresh food to remote military outposts, while uniforms and personal equipment are increasingly distributed through commercial logistics networks. Many military bases have also introduced civilian property-management services, and remote facilities are gradually being connected to municipal water, electricity, gas, and heating systems.

The PLA has also expanded cooperation with local hospitals, allowing service members and their families to access nearby public healthcare facilities. In addition, dedicated transportation channels for military personnel have been established at airports, railway stations, bus terminals, and ports nationwide. Chinese authorities said pilot programs involving commercial logistics, fuel supply, new-energy applications, and diversified transportation support are being rolled out across the military.

Source: People’s Daily, June 4, 2026
http://military.people.com.cn/n1/2026/0604/c1011-40733909.html

Briefings | | |   Defense/Military

Why Is Beijing Using Coast Guard Patrols Instead of Warships Near Taiwan?

On May 28, 2026, Japan and the Philippines announced the start of negotiations over the delimitation of their exclusive economic zones and continental shelves in waters east and southeast of Taiwan. On June 1, China’s Coast Guard announced that the Daishan vessel (2502) task group had conducted “law enforcement patrols” east of Taiwan, describing the operation as a response to the Japan–Philippines maritime negotiations.

Sources cited by The Epoch Times said the patrols were aimed less at military deterrence and more at increasing political and psychological pressure on Taiwan. One source close to the Chinese military claimed Beijing recognizes that such operations are unlikely to intimidate Taiwan’s government directly and is instead seeking to influence Taiwanese public opinion ahead of the 2028 presidential election.

Observers noted that China has increasingly relied on coast guard vessels, maritime surveillance ships, and so-called “law enforcement patrols” rather than traditional naval deployments around Taiwan. One scholar cited economic pressure as a major reason for the shift, arguing that coast guard operations are far less costly than military deployments while still allowing Beijing to create the perception of “encirclement” around Taiwan.

Analysts also said the strategy enables Beijing to frame its activities as administrative law enforcement or maritime management rather than overt military escalation. China hopes the regular presence of coast guard vessels will gradually normalize Beijing’s claims over waters currently regarded as part of international freedom of navigation zones.

Source: Epoch Times, June 4, 2026
https://www.epochtimes.com/gb/26/6/3/n14781055.htm

Briefings | | |   Defense/Military Geo-Strategic Trend Government/Politics

People’s Daily: Global Sixth-Generation Fighter Development Advances Amid Competition and Uncertainty

People’s Daily republished an article from China’s National Defense Newspaper examining global trends in the development of sixth-generation fighter aircraft.

Amid ongoing regional conflicts, rapid advances in artificial intelligence, and shifting national strategies, sixth-generation fighter development is entering a phase marked by both urgency and uncertainty, with major powers accelerating programs despite high costs and coordination challenges.

The UK, Japan, and Italy are advancing the Global Combat Air Programme (GCAP), recently awarding a £686 million ($930 million) contract and moving into coordinated development, while seeking additional partners such as Canada to share costs. The United States is pursuing parallel Air Force (F-47) and Navy (F/A-XX) programs, both receiving renewed prioritization and funding. In contrast, the France–Germany–Spain-led FCAS project remains stalled due to disagreements over design and industrial roles.

Although there is no unified definition of a sixth-generation fighter, most concepts emphasize advanced stealth, AI-assisted decision-making, and manned–unmanned teaming. Development is shifting from single-platform performance toward integrated, multi-domain combat systems capable of real-time coordination across land, sea, air, space, and cyber domains. At the same time, some countries are pursuing joint development to enhance long-term defense autonomy and reduce reliance on platforms such as the F-35.

Source: People’s Daily, April 22, 2026
http://military.people.com.cn/n1/2026/0422/c1011-40706277.html

Briefings | | |   Defense/Military

PLA Introduces New Logistics Supply Model to Improve Material Support Efficiency

People’s Daily republished an article from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Daily reporting that, since last year, the Central Military Commission’s Logistics Support Department has launched pilot programs to optimize military logistics and address difficulties faced by frontline units in obtaining supplies.

The reform introduces a system of “autonomous requisition within quotas, and application-based requisition beyond quotas,” allowing units to directly obtain supplies within set limits from nearby storage facilities without multiple approvals, while excess requests follow standard procedures.

The new model enables digital, end-to-end management of supply allocation. Units can independently request items such as rations and medical supplies, while support departments can forecast demand and allocate resources more precisely, with improved transparency throughout the process.

It also aims to accelerate response times, shifting from a traditional annual planning model to an “on-demand, rapid response” system, reducing supply cycles from weeks or months to days or hours.

Source: People’s Daily, May 14, 2026
http://military.people.com.cn/n1/2026/0514/c1011-40719541.html

Briefings | | |   Defense/Military

“To Build a Strong Military, the Armed Forces Must First Be Strong Politically”

People’s Daily republished an article from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Daily emphasizing the importance of building a politically strong military. The article quoted Xi Jinping, Chairman of the Central Military Commission (CMC), as stating that to build a strong military, the armed forces must first be strong politically, and that political strength is the most fundamental form of strength.

The article argued that political character is the essential attribute of the military, and that strengthening the armed forces must begin with strengthening them politically. It stressed that the Party’s absolute leadership over the military is the foundation of the armed forces and the core of building a strong military. It called for unwavering adherence to this principle, implement the CMC Chairman responsibility system, and resolutely follow the command of Chairman Xi, be accountable to Chairman Xi, and earn the trust of Chairman Xi.

It further called for cultivating comprehensive political capabilities, including political judgment, political understanding, and political execution. This involves analyzing and addressing issues from a political perspective, faithfully implementing decisions of the Party Central Committee, the CMC, and Xi Jinping, and integrating political requirements into all aspects of military preparedness, operations, and force management.

Source: People’s Daily, May 15, 2026
http://military.people.com.cn/n1/2026/0515/c1011-40720390.html

Briefings | | |   Defense/Military

Russia and North Korea Reportedly Plan Five-Year Military Cooperation Framework

Russia and North Korea are reportedly preparing a rare five-year military cooperation plan that could significantly accelerate Pyongyang’s military modernization in areas such as conventional weapons, satellites, nuclear-powered submarines, and next-generation missile systems. According to reporting cited by Hong Kong’s South China Morning Post, based on Russia’s TASS, Russian Defense Minister Andrey Belousov stated during an April 26 meeting in Pyongyang with Kim Jong Un that Moscow is prepared to sign a long-term military cooperation plan covering 2027 to 2031. He described bilateral ties as having reached an “unprecedentedly high level.”

Analysts note that Russia rarely establishes medium- to long-term military cooperation frameworks with foreign countries, typically reserving such arrangements for key strategic partners such as Belarus and India. This has led to assessments that North Korea may be entering a higher tier within Russia’s strategic framework. The reported initiative follows North Korea’s involvement in the Russia–Ukraine war since 2024, with estimation that Pyongyang has deployed 15,000 troops in support of Russian operations.

Experts cited in the report indicate that Russia could assist North Korea in enhancing capabilities in nuclear submarine technology, satellite systems, drone and missile production, as well as joint artillery and ammunition manufacturing. Some analysts also suggest that deepening Russia–North Korea military ties could raise concerns in Beijing, as closer alignment between Moscow and Pyongyang may reduce China’s influence over developments on the Korean Peninsula.

Source: Aboluo, May 11, 2026
https://www.aboluowang.com/2026/0511/2382326.html

Briefings | | |   Defense/Military Geo-Strategic Trend

Report: China Is Using Hong Kong Entities to Facilitate Iran’s Sanctions Evasion, Arms Procurement, and Financial Support

The Committee for Freedom in Hong Kong Foundation on May 11 released a report titled “Oil, Arms, and Cash: How Hong Kong Fuels the Iranian Regime,” stating that Hong Kong has become a key enabler of Iran’s activities. The report says Hong Kong-linked entities have helped Iran evade sanctions, finance proxy groups, procure weapons components, and expand surveillance systems. It highlights the role of Hong Kong-registered vessels in transporting Iranian oil—much of it sold to China—and the use of Hong Kong’s financial system for laundering proceeds. It also notes that major banks, including HSBC and Standard Chartered, have previously paid substantial fines for violating Iran-related restrictions.

Since 2020, at least 95 Hong Kong entities have been sanctioned by the U.S. Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) for assisting Iranian oil trade and sanctions evasion. In July 2025, OFAC sanctioned 17 Hong Kong companies linked to an Iranian shadow banking network. In September 2025, another network involving Hong Kong shell companies was designated for laundering over $100 million in cryptocurrency tied to Iranian oil revenues, some of which allegedly funded Hezbollah and other proxy groups. The U.S. Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network estimated that $4.8 billion in related transactions flowed through Hong Kong-linked accounts in 2024.

The report states that Hong Kong companies have acted as key transshipment hubs for dual-use electronics, drone engines, missile components, and centrifuge equipment tied to Iran’s weapons programs. U.S. indictments and sanctions filings cited in the report indicate that Hong Kong-based procurement networks supplied entities affiliated with Iran’s Ministry of Defense, including those involved in drones, radar systems, and ballistic missiles. Evidence from conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East has identified Western-made components, routed through Hong Kong, in Iranian Shahed and Mohajer drones.

The report also highlights the role of Chinese technology firms in supporting Iran’s surveillance capabilities. It states that Huawei Technologies used its Hong Kong subsidiary Skycom Tech to provide telecommunications and surveillance equipment to Iran, which U.S. authorities allege was used to monitor protesters. It adds that other Chinese firms, including ZTE, Hikvision, and Dahua Technology, have supplied surveillance technologies such as cameras, facial recognition systems, and internet monitoring tools used by the Iranian government.

Source: Epoch Times, May 12, 2026
https://www.epochtimes.com/gb/26/5/11/n14762232.htm

Briefings | | |   @CS Defense/Military Economy/Resources Geo-Strategic Trend Government/Politics