Skip to content

Social Stability - 66. page

Virus Origin: Zhong Nanshan Said Coronavirus May Have Originated Outside China

Zhong Nanshan, a high-profile doctor, the head of the High-level Expert Group of the National Health Commission, and an Academician at the Chinese Academy of Engineering, said that, though the Coronavirus epidemic started in China, it may not have originated in China.

Zhong made the statement at a press conference in Guangzhou on February 27, 2020.

Some Chinese netizens challenged Zhong’s logic. One questioned whether he had become the spokesperson for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

At the conference, Zhong also defended the official infection count. When a reporter mentioned a foreign estimate that there were 160,000 infections, Zhong said that China’s estimate of 70,000 infection cases was more accurate. The CCP has reported that there are 78,497 confirmed cases so far.

The authorities arranged for Zhong to go to Wuhan on January 20, 2020, to announce that the coronavirus could transmit from person to person. Afterwards, he predicted a few dates in February when the epidemic would slow down. This turned out to be too optimistic.

Related postings on Chinascope:

Continue reading

US Embassy in China Posted Pompeo’s Speech on China Expelling Wall Street Journal Reporters

The United States Embassy in China placed a post on its own website in Chinese. It included excerpts from the speech that Secretary of State Pompeo made at the press conference held on February 25, 2020 (original English speech can be found at: https://www.state.gov/secretary-michael-r-pompeo-remarks-to-the-press-5/).

The original transcript is below:

“Expelling our journalists exposes, once again, the governance issue that led to SARS, and now, the coronavirus, namely censorship.  It can have deadly consequences.  Had China permitted its own and foreign journalists and medical personnel to speak and investigate freely, Chinese officials and other nations would have been far better prepared to address the challenge.

QUESTION:  On China, you have issued a strong statement to condemn China for expelling The Wall Street Journal reporters.  What other options being considered by the United States to respond?  And what is your take on this headline controversy that some of The Wall Street Journal’s China staff have asked the paper to apologize and that the headline was considered by the Chinese Government to be racist?

SECRETARY POMPEO:  So with respect to the decision that the Chinese Communist Party made to expel three Wall Street Journal journalists, we made a statement; we’ve condemned it.  We’ve condemned it because it’s the wrong thing to do from a perspective of freedom.  We talk about reciprocity and what Chinese media outlets have access to or are permitted to do here in the United States.  That is not the case for U.S. media outlets or, for that matter, other non-Chinese media outlets inside of China as well.  So there’s an important principle there that we want to defend.

But second, it’s also incredibly important that we get accurate information about what’s taking place there. With respect to the coronavirus, this data set matters. This information matters. The tactical situation on the ground matters, not only to assist us in helping the Chinese people, which we are committed to continuing to do, but to make sure that we are helping citizens all across the world, including citizens right here in the United States.

So we think that information flow inside of China is at a critical moment.  It’s always important that we get good information, that there’s free press everywhere. But it’s especially essential at this time, where data and information matter because they provide things that go beyond anecdote so that we can respond in a way that meets the actual threat, not based on anecdote and rumor.

I don’t want to get ahead of what our policy options are that are being considered.  We’re looking at a broad range of things.  We will take the appropriate action and, if necessary, we’ll make sure that the President also gets a chance to weigh in on this decision as we move through our decision-making process.”

Source: US Embassy and Consulates in China website, February 25, 2020
https://china.usembassy-china.org.cn/zh/remarks-to-the-press-by-secretary-michael-r-pompeo-excerpts-zh/

Taiwan Ministry of Justice: Taiwan Has Been Flooded with Fake News from Beijing’s Cyberspace Army

The Investigation Bureau of the Ministry of Justice of Taiwan announced on February 26 that inaccurate news reports have been flooding Taiwan’s online social media. The usage of terms suggested that  the cyberspace army from mainland China had created them.

This fake news was packaged with events and supposed statements from politicians in Taiwan. For example, “My father is a Parliament Member from the Democratic Progressive Party. He talked about pneumonia last time and said that Taiwan had over 500 infection cases and 200 deaths. Hualien and Taipei were hit badly, but Tsai Ing-wen’s administration didn’t dare to announce it.”

Related postings on Chinascope:

Continue reading

Leadership: (Unconfirmed) Two High-Ranking Officials’ Family Members Are Infected

An unconfirmed Internet posting stated that Cai Erjin is the son of Cai Qi (蔡奇), Beijing Communist Party Secretary. Cai Erjin’s lover was infected with the coronavirus and later transmitted it to Cai Erjin and his wife. Cai Qi and his wife have been put under 14 days of quarantine.

An unconfirmed tweet said that Chua Hwa Por, son-in-law of Li Zhanshu (栗战书), Chairman of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress and a member of the Chinese Communist Party’s Politburo Standing Committee, was infected with the coronavirus. Chua was a citizen of Singapore and lived there. Li Zhanshu sent a private plane to bring his son-in-law back to Beijing. Li tried to get him to stay in the military No 301 Hospital, which provides healthcare to the high-ranking officials, but the retired officials who currently stay at the hospital uniformly rejected it. Li then put him in the China-Japan Friendship Hospital, where Cai Qi’s son Cai Erjin also stayed. Xi Jinping was unhappy with bringing a coronavirus patient back to Beijing.

Related postings on Chinascope:

Continue reading

Death Count: Placing Patient in Corpse Bag While Alive

Taiwan News reported that a video posted on YouTube on February 24 showed a woman in Wuhan, coming out of the hospital. She told the car driver that she saw the patient in the bed next to her was bagged while still alive. He was put into a corpse bag and sent to cremation.

She said, “The man was weak but he was still breathing when the medical workers bound his head and then his hands and feet, which were “still moving.” Then the medical personnel placed the man in a black plastic bag and pulled up the zipper and placed the bag in another plastic bag. The bag was then sent to the funeral house to incinerate.

She said that she saw that a few other patients had also been bagged while still alive.

The Epoch Times also reported that Mr. Tong in Wuhan posted the following on the Internet: “The Doctor asked me to help him carry my father’s dead body. I went into the room and touched his calf. It was still warm. I shouted, ‘Dad.” He opened his eyes and tried to speak. The Doctor was shocked and yelled at me to get out. My dad was then placed naked in the corpse bag. I begged them to put some clothes on him, but they didn’t allow me.”

Related postings on Chinascope:

Continue reading

Resuming Production: Xi Jinping Said Half of China’s Counties Do Not Have Coronavirus

Radio France International reported that Xi Jinping said that about half of China’s counties do not have the coronavirus. He gave directions that regions with a low epidemic risk should “fully resume production and living orders.”

Some large manufactures in China offered a bonus to attract workers to return to work. Some local governments also used planes, trains, and buses to bring people back to work.

Related postings on Chinascope:

Continue reading

WHO: Official Went to Wuhan but Didn’t Go to “Dirty Area”

China’s Ministry of Health and the World Health Organization (WHO) experts held a press conference in Beijing on February 24. At the conference, Bruce Aylward, Assistant Director General of WHO, led a group of experts to visit China to check on the coronavirus situation there. He said that he had been to Wuhan but did not go to the “dirty areas” in the Wuhan hospitals. He then rushed to catch the plane to fly out of China without quarantining himself for 14 days (after returning from Wuhan).

News reporters suspected that “dirty” was a technical term referring to infectious areas.

Source: Australia 51, February 25, 2020
https://en.australia51.com/article/6151DD84-C03D-5B1B-6BEC-0B4E42A5EBF3/

Infection Count: Shandong Internal Report Had Much Higher Infection Count Than the Published Numbers

Epoch Times, an independent Chinese language media based in the U.S., provided details from the internal reports that it obtained from the Shandong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). These reports, which were provided to the Shandong Provincial Health Commission, showed much higher coronavirus infection counts than the official number that China published.

On February 19, CDC’s and hospitals in Shandong reported 49 new infection cases based on positive results shown in nucleic acid tests. On that day, Shandong announced only 2 new cases. On February 20, 274 cases tested positive (one of which was a case that had been confirmed already), while the officially published number was 202.

Epoch Times created a table to compare the internally reported count vs. the officially announced count from February 8 to February 22. The first column is the date, second column is the officially announced new infection count, the third one is the internally reported cases, and the fourth one is the percent of internal count over the published count.

Image of the Epoch Times’ table:

The nucleic acid test will only show positive for 30-50 percent of the coronavirus infections. Therefore, the actual infection count may be proportionately higher than the report that is officially published.

Related postings on Chinascope:

Continue reading